this post was submitted on 17 Sep 2026
642 points (98.8% liked)

Technology

88183 readers
2919 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
 

“You thought you’d get away with this. I am in your car. I am in your maps,” he shouted at her, according to the police records.

Over the coming days, Stacey found that the parental control profile, to which she had no access, could almost entirely control the car, including its speed, climate control, lock and curfew hours, determining when the car could be driven.

Between 6 and 12 November 2025, Pucci remotely alternated the car’s temperature setting between extremely cold and extremely hot.

“The victim has not been able to drive certain speeds and on most recent occasions throughout this period, [the accused] has turned on ‘Valet Mode’ which immediately reduces the speed to 40km per hour causing significant safety issues for the victim on the road”, the police documents stated.

“The victim has not had any control of her vehicle since she noticed the parental control profile added on the 1st November 2025.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] minorkeys@sh.itjust.works 59 points 4 days ago (4 children)

The fact these controls exist at all is a fucking nightmare. How are these vehicles legally sold? This technology should illegal I'm vehicles.

[–] Telorand@reddthat.com 22 points 4 days ago (1 children)

To paraphrase Strong Bad: "Your [car] has too much computer in it...and not enough typewriter."

[–] greatwhitebuffalo41@slrpnk.net 8 points 4 days ago* (last edited 4 days ago) (1 children)

I love seeing strong bad references in the wild!

Virus equals very yes? Computer over?! What does that mean?!

[–] verily@lemmy.dbzer0.com 5 points 4 days ago (1 children)

Really, we should have heeded his warnings.

I did say "if you fall in a bottomless pit, you die of starvation" out loud today and no one got it

[–] minfapper@piefed.social 10 points 4 days ago* (last edited 4 days ago) (1 children)

I hate to break it to you, but most modern cars have this level of remote controls - they're just not exposed to owners.

https://www.wired.com/2015/07/hackers-remotely-kill-jeep-highway/

[–] brownsugga@lemmy.world 1 points 3 days ago

Yeah that story is 11 years old now (jeez I remember when it came out)

[–] Quexotic@infosec.pub 4 points 4 days ago (1 children)

The car hacking scene is growing in response. More and more, it's becoming possible to disable/circumvent these remote capabilities. Not that the car makers are making it easy.

[–] minorkeys@sh.itjust.works 0 points 3 days ago

So are actors like Putin. I doubt these systems exist in the presidential motorcade.

[–] Malica@lemmy.zip 2 points 4 days ago

I honestly don't know, they're death traps