this post was submitted on 09 Sep 2026
708 points (96.8% liked)

Lemmy Shitpost

41839 readers
5119 users here now

Welcome to Lemmy Shitpost. Here you can shitpost to your hearts content.

Anything and everything goes. Memes, Jokes, Vents and Banter. Though we still have to comply with lemmy.world instance rules. So behave!


Rules:

1. Be Respectful


Refrain from using harmful language pertaining to a protected characteristic: e.g. race, gender, sexuality, disability or religion.

Refrain from being argumentative when responding or commenting to posts/replies. Personal attacks are not welcome here.

...


2. No Illegal Content


Content that violates the law. Any post/comment found to be in breach of common law will be removed and given to the authorities if required.

That means:

-No promoting violence/threats against any individuals

-No CSA content or Revenge Porn

-No sharing private/personal information (Doxxing)

...


3. No Spam


Posting the same post, no matter the intent is against the rules.

-If you have posted content, please refrain from re-posting said content within this community.

-Do not spam posts with intent to harass, annoy, bully, advertise, scam or harm this community.

-No posting Scams/Advertisements/Phishing Links/IP Grabbers

-No Bots, Bots will be banned from the community.

...


4. No Porn/ExplicitContent


-Do not post explicit content. Lemmy.World is not the instance for NSFW content.

-Do not post Gore or Shock Content.

...


5. No Enciting Harassment,Brigading, Doxxing or Witch Hunts


-Do not Brigade other Communities

-No calls to action against other communities/users within Lemmy or outside of Lemmy.

-No Witch Hunts against users/communities.

-No content that harasses members within or outside of the community.

...


6. NSFW should be behind NSFW tags.


-Content that is NSFW should be behind NSFW tags.

-Content that might be distressing should be kept behind NSFW tags.

...

If you see content that is a breach of the rules, please flag and report the comment and a moderator will take action where they can.


Also check out:

Partnered Communities:

1.Memes

2.Lemmy Review

3.Mildly Infuriating

4.Lemmy Be Wholesome

5.No Stupid Questions

6.You Should Know

7.Comedy Heaven

8.Credible Defense

9.Ten Forward

10.LinuxMemes (Linux themed memes)


Reach out to

All communities included on the sidebar are to be made in compliance with the instance rules. Striker

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] grrgyle@slrpnk.net 1 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (3 children)

Do you really believe that? :(

I'll fill you in. Maybe you haven't heard these points before, but vegans hear them every time they talk about what they won't eat and why.

Is it intellectual laziness if the objections/rebuttals are so cliché that you can predict both sides with a bingo game? My hope was that would give readers pause about why they feel compelled to make the same points over and over again and again, expecting people on a PBD to justify their decision not to eat animal products.

It's not an interesting debate.

[–] hans@feddit.org 2 points 18 hours ago (1 children)

you're not engaging with the other person at all. you're treating them like they are a child to be taught. you have no idea whether they've seen these arguments before. you just threw a link at them.

[–] grrgyle@slrpnk.net 1 points 16 hours ago

I reread my responses and it's possible they see things as you do, but I think it's also possible you're reading into a my comments a tone that isn't borne out by the text or context.

Anyway, whatever it was, I guess it wasn't the right approach. I really don't think I "threw" a link at anyone, or said anything patronizing.

Also no one has answered any of my questions, so I'm not sure what I'm even doing here...

[–] hans@feddit.org 1 points 18 hours ago (1 children)

no one ever demanded you justify your decision to eat plants

[–] grrgyle@slrpnk.net 1 points 17 hours ago (1 children)

You replied to the wrong comment.

[–] hans@feddit.org 1 points 17 hours ago (1 children)
[–] grrgyle@slrpnk.net 1 points 16 hours ago

Rereading, rereading... Oh, I see it. Yeah that's an aside to their aside. That wasn't my core point, or even I think theirs... They were talking about how vegans could make a more compelling case by avoiding "the morality argument" how they already agree with them etc.

I can't believe that someone who's clearly thought about the vegan position believes that they want to bring about some kind of "animal genocide" ... I feel like I matched their tone pretty well.

[–] hans@feddit.org 1 points 18 hours ago (1 children)

It's not an interesting debate.

so don't engage, but don't pretend you've rebutted anything.

[–] grrgyle@slrpnk.net 1 points 17 hours ago (1 children)

I was hoping they would read the like three paragraphs on that website about their points and maybe come back with a bit more nuance.

At least you're actually engaging. The other one seems to have lost interest —maybe from me calling our back and forth cliché.

[–] hans@feddit.org 1 points 17 hours ago (1 children)

or because they recognized how lazy and dismissive your response was, and they don't care to be patronized.

[–] grrgyle@slrpnk.net 1 points 16 hours ago

Alright that's an answer, maybe I should be more conscientious of my tone. If that's what you honestly believe I'm not going to say your perspective is wrong just because I don't see it.