this post was submitted on 10 Sep 2026
267 points (90.8% liked)

Technology

88802 readers
3596 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.

Our Rules

  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
L3s@lemmy.world
enu@lemmy.world
technopagan@lemmy.world
L4s@lemmy.world
L3s@hackingne.ws
267
GrapheneOS defends use of AI for coding (grapheneos.social)
submitted 1 month ago by General_Effort@lemmy.world to c/technology@lemmy.world
329 comments fedilink hide all child comments
 

GrapheneOS is currently defending its use of AI coding tools on Mastodon against complaints by various accounts claiming to be users.

We do not understand where you're coming from or why you're so incredibly angry with us. It's not justified and does not make sense.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] unglueclass23@programming.dev 29 points 1 month ago (12 children)

A bit unrelated, but I wonder if I'm the only one left that is:

  • Using small, open-weight models
  • Asking it to only write small snippets that I can easily go through, check and understand.
  • Copying pasting from good old web frontends instead of integrating it into my editor or whatever else people do with agents nowadays.

I feel like when we're talking about AI this sort of usage gets lumped into the same pile as agentic vibe coding and it's not helpful for discussion. Surely most people wouldn't find this problematic?

[–] Xuntari@programming.dev 8 points 1 month ago (6 children)

Probably.

My company is currently pushing "loop engineering" on us... They are in love with Claude and keeps referring to it as "him". Very proudly announce that "I set ut a loop, and he closed 40 PRs while I slept!" (without review, of course). Based on vibe written tickets as well, which contains many hallucinations.

The poor QA department (2 people) is now trying to figure out how to test all the slop.

[–] jaxxed@lemmy.world 6 points 1 month ago

We usually say "the other guy", or sometimes we say "I & AI" (a poor twst on a Rastafarian saying)

load more comments (5 replies)
load more comments (10 replies)