this post was submitted on 05 Sep 2026
570 points (86.6% liked)

memes

22593 readers
2145 users here now

Community rules

1. Be civilNo trolling, bigotry or other insulting / annoying behaviour

2. No politicsThis is non-politics community. For political memes please go to !politicalmemes@lemmy.world

3. No recent repostsCheck for reposts when posting a meme, you can only repost after 1 month

4. No botsNo bots without the express approval of the mods or the admins

5. No Spam/Ads/AI SlopNo advertisements or spam. This is an instance rule and the only way to live. We also consider AI slop to be spam in this community and is subject to removal.

A collection of some classic Lemmy memes for your enjoyment

Sister communities

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] daniskarma@lemmy.dbzer0.com 56 points 1 day ago (4 children)

Infinite growth of human population would hit a hard ceiling on earth resources real soon.

People not having babies is a good thing.

[–] Splenetic@lemmy.nz 12 points 19 hours ago

The 1st 40years of my life i was told I had to worry about over population, in the last 5 I've been told I now need to worry about "demographic collapse"

[–] kalkulat@lemmy.world 2 points 17 hours ago* (last edited 17 hours ago) (1 children)

Right on. The way the way population is right now, every time a chunk of mountain or glacier falls down, or a river floods, tens of thousands die or are displaced.

In 1960 there were 2-3 billion people on the planet. Now it's 3x as many cars, mouths to feed, homes to heat/cool.

In Bangladesh there are over 1 million Rohingan refugees who've been there for TEN YEARS. They can't work there, have no country to move to, have to live on $6-12 a month for food.

[–] danciestlobster@lemmy.zip 1 points 10 hours ago

It's actually more than 2-3x as many cars I believe, given cultural changes since 1960 as well

[–] myyass@lemmy.world 6 points 22 hours ago

I agree. I chose not to have kids for various reasons. And my "skilled" lol trade skills will die with me.

[–] ADTJ@feddit.uk 8 points 1 day ago (1 children)

It's not about infinite growth.

Given that not everyone lives to old age, we would expect children to outnumber old people even in a zero (or slightly negative) percent growth scenario.

[–] SethW@lemmy.world 1 points 17 hours ago* (last edited 17 hours ago)

Sure but lets allow the world population to naturally contract to 500 million or so before we start pushing for replacement numbers