this post was submitted on 05 Sep 2026
540 points (87.5% liked)

memes

22584 readers
2100 users here now

Community rules

1. Be civilNo trolling, bigotry or other insulting / annoying behaviour

2. No politicsThis is non-politics community. For political memes please go to !politicalmemes@lemmy.world

3. No recent repostsCheck for reposts when posting a meme, you can only repost after 1 month

4. No botsNo bots without the express approval of the mods or the admins

5. No Spam/Ads/AI SlopNo advertisements or spam. This is an instance rule and the only way to live. We also consider AI slop to be spam in this community and is subject to removal.

A collection of some classic Lemmy memes for your enjoyment

Sister communities

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] BradleyUffner@lemmy.world 26 points 13 hours ago (4 children)

Sounds like a situation that will self correct in a few decades, no?

[–] forkDestroyer@infosec.pub 12 points 9 hours ago (1 children)

People think we need to keep growing the population. We're stuck on a single planet together. If we could live on the moon or Mars it would be a different story, but I think it's perfectly fine to decrease the population size back to 1980s levels, at least.

[–] Insekticus@aussie.zone 2 points 5 hours ago (1 children)

And we're talking about the elderly who don't add any productivity to the planet too.

Sure, some minority of boomers have a good attitude and want to work for the planet and the future generations, but the reality is that a majority of them have piss poor values and are now a net drain on society.

[–] 123@programming.dev 1 points 1 hour ago* (last edited 1 hour ago)

Plenty of people in other age groups that are also a net drain on society. We won't get far if we don't see it as the class issue that it mostly is.

[–] boonhet@sopuli.xyz 4 points 11 hours ago* (last edited 11 hours ago) (1 children)

Not really, unless Gen Z starts having a fuckload of babies soon. Because each generation will be progressively smaller if the fertility rates don't rise.

It's not a huge issue in the third world where your kids are your retirement plan anyway so they have a ton more children. In the developed world, we have pension systems and stuff so on an individual level, having kids is likely bad for you financially, you want other people to have kids so you don't have to spend a bunch of money raising them, but their taxes pay for your retirement..

[–] Funkt4st1c@lemmy.world 5 points 10 hours ago

Just funnel money from billionaires into it and problem solved. We can keep the aame money in circulation, half the population, and be fine. I see no issue with lowering birth rates, and wvery issue with a lack of policy changes surrounding it

[–] explodicle@sh.itjust.works 3 points 12 hours ago

Unless there's some horrible disaster in the coming decades that will kill billions and harm wealthy old people less.

[–] holy_scroller@lemmy.zip 1 points 10 hours ago

People live longer every decade and the definition of Senior Citizen doesn't change. This would not be a bad fact on its own...but declining birth rates can cause many issues.