this post was submitted on 31 Aug 2026
814 points (99.6% liked)

Technology

87744 readers
3138 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Magnum@infosec.pub 20 points 14 hours ago (2 children)

Doesn't this just track the shit out of you? Does it also click malicious ad banners?

[–] brucethemoose@lemmy.world 13 points 14 hours ago

Well, it anonymizes you by "faking" the tracking. I would hope it takes steps to sandbox the ads.

[–] dellish@lemmy.world 7 points 14 hours ago* (last edited 14 hours ago) (2 children)

Step 2: install Privacy Badger

And Facebook Container is another useful one.

[–] Axolotl_cpp@feddit.it 11 points 13 hours ago* (last edited 13 hours ago)

Don't, privacy badge and adnauseam will interfere eachothers and as result you will get worst results, you are better off using a DNS level adblocker (eg: Pihole or NextDNS if you don't/can't self host) alongside uBlock/adnauseam

[–] danielfm123@lemmy.zip 3 points 14 hours ago (1 children)

Ublock already does the job of privacy badger... Well as far as I know...

[–] rumba@lemmy.zip 6 points 11 hours ago (1 children)

They overlap; Ublock does it through lists, and badger does it through heuristics.

Running just badger, it can miss things, if you can use both, you get all the lists and heuristics, but they're probalby not both necessary

[–] mschae@discuss.mschae23.de 2 points 11 hours ago (1 children)

It's best not to use multiple ad blockers at the same time. They'll conflict with each other and you'll be worse off. uBO alone is probably enough.

[–] rumba@lemmy.zip 5 points 10 hours ago (1 children)

Conflict with each other how?

[–] Taldan@lemmy.world 7 points 9 hours ago (3 children)

I've used them both for years and never noticed any sort of conflict, but I've heard that potential conflict mentioned several times with no clarification

[–] kestrel7_7@lemmy.world 1 points 6 hours ago

In theory it could make your browser run a bit slower. In practice, with modern computer/phone hardware, I doubt anyone would notice the fraction of a second “delay.”

[–] mschae@discuss.mschae23.de 3 points 8 hours ago

To be fair, I've heard it from somewhere else too. I'll see if I can find a source.

[–] rumba@lemmy.zip 2 points 7 hours ago

I've heard the same, but have never put too much stock in it. They'll apply one after the other. Since the only outcome is block, the math on it should be fine.

The serious downsides I've even seen are that you have to disable both when you do have a problem.