No Stupid Questions

4348 readers

24 users here now

There is no such thing as a Stupid Question!

Don't be embarrassed of your curiosity; everyone has questions that they may feel uncomfortable asking certain people, so this place gives you a nice area not to be judged about asking it. Everyone here is willing to help.

ex. How do I change oil
ex. How to tie shoes
ex. Can you cry underwater?

Reminder that the rules for lemmy.ca still apply!

Thanks for reading all of this, even if you didn't read all of this, and your eye started somewhere else, have a watermelon slice 🍉.

founded 4 years ago

MODERATORS

admin@lemmy.ca

Was the 12th amendment a mistake? (lemmy.world)

submitted 1 month ago by ChonkyOwlbear@lemmy.world to c/nostupidquestions@lemmy.ca

49 comments fedilink hide all child comments

Before the 12th amendment, the presidential candidate who got the second most electoral votes became the vice president. This meant they were usually different parties.

It occurred to me that one thing this achieved was always ensuring that there was someone in the room who would be willing to disagree with the president. He couldn't surround himself with yes-men.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] harrys_balzac@lemmy.dbzer0.com 4 points 1 month ago

Personally, I think it was a mistake.

It solidified the party ticket.

Having a vice president that came in second means that, if something happens to the President, the country will be led by someone qualified.

As far as checks and balances go, the vice president is the tie breaker in the Senate. With the 12th amendment in place, that vote is essentially the President's vote.

We would still have a system of parties but the dynamic would be dramatically different.

Finally, the original system meant that most Americans would feel represented. Yes, the VP has little power but they can have lots of influence.