this post was submitted on 29 Aug 2026
890 points (99.8% liked)

Linux

14869 readers
628 users here now

A community for everything relating to the GNU/Linux operating system (except the memes!)

Also, check out:

Original icon base courtesy of lewing@isc.tamu.edu and The GIMP

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] username_1@discuss.tchncs.de 50 points 3 days ago (2 children)

Why? That law was stupid in the first place but now it is completely idiotic. It isn't coherent even with its original sick logic.

[–] chicken@lemmy.dbzer0.com 6 points 3 days ago

My guess is they figure it will make little difference due to network effects, and by making this exception they can remove a meaningful source of political resistance to the change. If the vast majority of users are running operating systems that declare underage status, then websites and apps will be able to use those signals to sidestep legal liability for actually doing anything meaningful to protect underage users, and new laws can be passed that assume the use of those signals is possible. That it isn't 100% doesn't change that very much.

[–] Eldritch@piefed.world 3 points 3 days ago

That's far too many laws to be fair. So totally normal unfortunately. A true (Situation Normal. All Fucked Up)