this post was submitted on 29 Aug 2026
267 points (97.5% liked)

Fuck Cars

16532 readers
1049 users here now

A place to discuss problems of car centric infrastructure or how it hurts us all. Let's explore the bad world of Cars!

Rules

1. Be CivilYou may not agree on ideas, but please do not be needlessly rude or insulting to other people in this community.

2. No hate speechDon't discriminate or disparage people on the basis of sex, gender, race, ethnicity, nationality, religion, or sexuality.

3. Don't harass peopleDon't follow people you disagree with into multiple threads or into PMs to insult, disparage, or otherwise attack them. And certainly don't doxx any non-public figures.

4. Stay on topicThis community is about cars, their externalities in society, car-dependency, and solutions to these.

5. No repostsDo not repost content that has already been posted in this community.

Moderator discretion will be used to judge reports with regard to the above rules.

Posting Guidelines

In the absence of a flair system on lemmy yet, let’s try to make it easier to scan through posts by type in here by using tags:

Recommended communities:

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] jaybone@lemmy.zip 11 points 2 days ago (2 children)

A fuckcars sub is arguing against removal of a parking lot?

[–] quick_snail@feddit.nl 2 points 1 day ago (1 children)

In a photo post no less.

Where the fuck are the mods?

I'm not a fan of removing dissenters just for being stupid and wrong. I'd rather insult them.

[–] zoloftt@lemmy.world 5 points 2 days ago (2 children)

The sale would be to build a hotel. It's not like hotels reduce the amount of vehicles people are driving.

It's potentially worse than the parking lot.

[–] ramble81@lemmy.zip 1 points 10 hours ago (1 children)

So this a “fuck everything I don’t like including cars” sub. Got it.

[–] zoloftt@lemmy.world 1 points 10 hours ago (1 children)

You understand that cars are used to get places??? So when a parking lot is replaced, then those cars that were using the lot need to find another place?

You understand second order effects right?

[–] ramble81@lemmy.zip 0 points 10 hours ago (1 children)

But cars don’t have to be used, which is the point of this sub. A hotel can have people arriving via shuttle, via bus, walking from a nearby train station. Yes there will be cars, but it’s reduced. A parking lot can only be used as a parking lot for cars.

[–] zoloftt@lemmy.world 1 points 8 hours ago

Fantastic. MAYBE people WON'T use cars to get to the hotel.

https://www.theacorn.com/articles/study-shows-hotel-would-generate-slightly-less-traffic-than-office-building/

But everything I can find, shows that building a hotel DOES increase cars on the road. Linked one example.

[–] jaybone@lemmy.zip 8 points 1 day ago (2 children)

Where should they put the hotel then? In the middle of nowhere so people have to drive there?

[–] zoloftt@lemmy.world 0 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

There are quite a few jotels already there so I'm not sure what your point is?

[–] Armok_the_bunny@lemmy.world -2 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Who says they need a hotel. Might as well ask where they would put the used car dealership.

[–] Godric@lemmy.world 4 points 1 day ago (2 children)

Yeah, nobody ever goes to Boulder CO, anyone dumb enough to visit their kid at UC can easilly sleep in their... car...

[–] Armok_the_bunny@lemmy.world 1 points 1 day ago

Ok fine then, another hotel.

[–] zoloftt@lemmy.world 0 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

There are quite a few in Boulder already, quite a few near UC Boulder... So what's your point?