this post was submitted on 28 Aug 2026
774 points (98.6% liked)

Technology

87624 readers
4356 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
 

For her safety, Doe has opted to receive alerts from the US Department of Justice Victim Notification System any time she may be a victim in a new criminal investigation. Although she has received countless alerts, she was shocked when the CCCP notified her that it had identified AI-generated CSAM on xAI that depicted her. This re-traumatized Doe, whose complaint alleged that messages were found on online forums “between offenders chatting about creating AI generated CSAM of Plaintiff and other similarly situated known, legacy, victims of CSAM.”

Now, Doe fears that xAI has not only made it easier to make more violative images of the most distressing time in her life, but also that xAI allegedly has stored the images that Grok generates and uses those outputs to further train Grok. Because of this, she believes that Grok has been trained on both the initial set of images that have haunted her for more than 20 years and the more recent AI-generated ones.

This is the first case to accuse xAI of training on CSAM, and the complaint does not go into great detail on that claim. Previously, Ars reported on a controversial dataset that was later scrubbed after researchers found CSAM in the training data, but there’s no indication xAI trained on that data. In a press release from lawyers representing Doe, it explained that Doe’s images were included in a CSAM Hash List maintained by NCMEC, and “that same material” allegedly “was part of the dataset xAI used to build Grok’s image and video generating capabilities.” The complaint similarly only alleged that “CSAM depicting Plaintiff with its longstanding well-known hash values has been used as a part of the dataset used by xAI.”

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] ShutUpWesley@piefed.zip 29 points 17 hours ago (2 children)

All billionaires are pedophiles

[–] story@lemmy.zip 3 points 10 hours ago* (last edited 10 hours ago) (2 children)

if we could expand this conversation, i think that to a degree the reverse is true.

i think the neurotypes (we might call them paraphilias actually but you'd be surprised how many people can be reduced to a paraphilia) that connect sex with power imbalance (age, wealth, intelligence, strength, or just legal context like contracts and political relationships) also tend to hoard (valuable things, money, information, connections, data, favors) and these tendencies strengthen each other in a stronger way than most people understand

if you're interested in what I'm saying, look up "impunity architecture", especially if you're Marxist because i think a lot of people think this is inherent to capitalism and it isn't at all.

[–] ShutUpWesley@piefed.zip 2 points 9 hours ago (2 children)

I've always said that the biggest difference between a billionaire on a yatch and a homeless man with a cart of garbage is luck.

[–] story@lemmy.zip 2 points 8 hours ago

Tom Sexton likes to say that rich people are poor people with money

[–] uriel238@lemmy.blahaj.zone 1 points 7 hours ago

Billionaires usually start with a specific luck package that includes generational wealth and family connections. Then, a bunch of opportunity being at the right place at the right time.

If you don't have one of the first two then the opportunity has to do a whole lot more heavy lifting. Also, if you have enough generational wealth, then you can fail upwards, as did George W. Bush and Donald J. Trump.

Also plenty of people have the starting gen-wealth/family-connections package but not the luck of opportunity. And they will commonly end up with a solid career, but doesn't move them towards ultra-wealthy status. So millions or even tens of millions rather than hundreds of millions or billions.

And then there's the rare dude like Tom Anderson who made MySpace, sold it for about $500 million and has since spent the rest of his life traveling and going on fun adventures. But he would have been a musician or a philosophy professor if he didn't luck into making MySpace.

[–] magnue@lemmy.world 0 points 7 hours ago (1 children)

My brain switched off slightly at the word neurotypes, then completely at the word paraphilias, FYI.

[–] story@lemmy.zip 1 points 5 hours ago

i wish for a world where we can communicate with experiences instead of words, we would understand each other so much better.

[–] schmups@lemmy.zip 0 points 10 hours ago (1 children)

Backward comments like this are why the conversation doesn't move.

[–] ShutUpWesley@piefed.zip 3 points 9 hours ago (1 children)

Can you explain why you think it's backwards? It may be hyperbolic and facetious, but I think recent history has shown a statistically significant correlation between the ultra-wealthy and pedophilia.

[–] BeliefsOnTrain@lemmy.world 1 points 6 hours ago (1 children)

Correlation doesn't imply causation does it?

I think that's another generalization based on indeed totally true recent news. But he is right that this is not at all helping the reasonning, hence "backward"

[–] ShutUpWesley@piefed.zip 1 points 6 hours ago

I don't think I was suggesting that being a billionaire causes you to be pedophile, or the other way around.

Do all statements that do not forward some sort of effort to reason through things count as backwards?