this post was submitted on 27 Aug 2026
195 points (97.1% liked)

Fuck Cars

16608 readers
505 users here now

A place to discuss problems of car centric infrastructure or how it hurts us all. Let's explore the bad world of Cars!

Rules

1. Be CivilYou may not agree on ideas, but please do not be needlessly rude or insulting to other people in this community.

2. No hate speechDon't discriminate or disparage people on the basis of sex, gender, race, ethnicity, nationality, religion, or sexuality.

3. Don't harass peopleDon't follow people you disagree with into multiple threads or into PMs to insult, disparage, or otherwise attack them. And certainly don't doxx any non-public figures.

4. Stay on topicThis community is about cars, their externalities in society, car-dependency, and solutions to these.

5. No repostsDo not repost content that has already been posted in this community.

Moderator discretion will be used to judge reports with regard to the above rules.

Posting Guidelines

In the absence of a flair system on lemmy yet, let’s try to make it easier to scan through posts by type in here by using tags:

Recommended communities:

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Maybe it’s a nitpick, but it’s annoying having to get on road just to walk pass it.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] grue@lemmy.world 12 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago) (1 children)

The fact that the sidewalk's pavers are rotated 90° compared to those in both the parking lot aisle and (more importantly) the parking space to the right is also enough to prove the designer's intent, even disregarding the color difference entirely.

I totally agree that said designer shouldn't have let aesthetics come at the cost of accessibility, though.

[–] clay_pidgin@sh.itjust.works 1 points 2 weeks ago

I didn't even notice the paver direction. That's pretty subtle for a safety feature!