this post was submitted on 26 Aug 2026
97 points (92.2% liked)

sh.itjust.works Main Community

8500 readers
3 users here now

Home of the sh.itjust.works instance.

Matrix

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Because I'd guess it is--a covered teacup with a misplaced handle, random "generic devices" scattered about, cables that go nowhere....

Any interest is an open call for a replacement image for the server?

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Susaga@sh.itjust.works 18 points 4 days ago (3 children)

I'm glad someone said something about it, because I don't like having to see it when I look at the main page. The uneven fingers disturb me. I'm sure we have a few artists on here that wouldn't mind their work getting main-page treatment. You could run a contest!

[–] schipelblorp@sh.itjust.works 10 points 4 days ago (1 children)

I'd want approval from the site operator before people get out their pencils.

[–] Susaga@sh.itjust.works 5 points 4 days ago

Yeah, 100%, which is why I'm making the case to convince them. If nothing else, I'm letting my voice be heard.

[–] i_need_your_bones@piefed.social 5 points 4 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago)

They did run one. AI art had quite a few slots, and this AI slop won. Real art was contributed but didn't win

Edit: Turns out it was all AI.

[–] atzanteol@sh.itjust.works -4 points 4 days ago (4 children)

You're asking artists to work for "exposure?"

[–] Dave@lemmy.nz 15 points 4 days ago (1 children)

Something to remember is that the Threadiverse runs on unpaid labour. Someone donating their time to create art is no different to someone donating their time to run the server or develop Piefed ot whatever.

There's unlikely to be any exposure from the art anyway, so any artist should only do it because they want to contribute to the ecosystem not because they think they will receive exposure in lieu of payment.

[–] atzanteol@sh.itjust.works -5 points 3 days ago (1 children)

There's a difference between offering your own labor for free and asking others to donate their time for "exposure".

[–] Dave@lemmy.nz 2 points 3 days ago

There's no exposure, you're the one suggesting that is the payment but no one is offering exposure, they are asking for volunteer help to contribute to a volunteer run ecosystem.

Many instances ask people to give their labour for free without waiting for someone to offer. Lemmy.world ran a full interview process to appoint volunteer admins.

[–] fake@sh.itjust.works 6 points 3 days ago

This is only ever a problem when the thing they're being asked to do for 'exposure' is normal paid work. In this context nobody is being paid, their work isn't enriching someone else, they would be contributing like all the lemmy devs, the server operators and everyone else contributing to the operation of the site. Nobody's approached a specific artist and requested they do this for 'exposure', someone’s simply suggested that, oh hey, like everyone else that contributes their time to the site, maybe an artist would like to contribute theirs as well.

Pull your head out of your arse.

[–] Susaga@sh.itjust.works 2 points 4 days ago* (last edited 4 days ago) (1 children)

I'm asking for the image to be replaced, and suggesting a way to do that. If we do that, and if there's compensation, can be a later discussion.

[–] atzanteol@sh.itjust.works -5 points 4 days ago

That's a very long way to spell "yes".

[–] schipelblorp@sh.itjust.works 0 points 4 days ago (1 children)

Are you offering to raise a collection?

[–] atzanteol@sh.itjust.works -3 points 3 days ago (1 children)

No? But I'm not the one offering "exposure" for art.

[–] schipelblorp@sh.itjust.works 2 points 3 days ago (1 children)

You're not willing to pay the artist anything, either.

[–] atzanteol@sh.itjust.works -2 points 3 days ago (1 children)

I'm not asking them to donate their time.

[–] fake@sh.itjust.works 0 points 3 days ago

And you're not the artist, so if you could kindly leave the conversation that'd be great!