this post was submitted on 24 Aug 2026
1698 points (99.5% liked)

Microblog Memes

12059 readers
1913 users here now

A place to share screenshots of Microblog posts, whether from Mastodon, tumblr, ~~Twitter~~ X, KBin, Threads or elsewhere.

Created as an evolution of White People Twitter and other tweet-capture subreddits.

RULES:

  1. Your post must be a screen capture of a microblog-type post that includes the UI of the site it came from, preferably also including the avatar and username of the original poster. Including relevant comments made to the original post is encouraged.
  2. Your post, included comments, or your title/comment should include some kind of commentary or remark on the subject of the screen capture. Your title must include at least one word relevant to your post.
  3. You are encouraged to provide a link back to the source of your screen capture in the body of your post.
  4. Current politics and news are allowed, but discouraged. There MUST be some kind of human commentary/reaction included (either by the original poster or you). Just news articles or headlines will be deleted.
  5. Doctored posts/images and AI are allowed, but discouraged. You MUST indicate this in your post (even if you didn't originally know). If an image is found to be fabricated or edited in any way and it is not properly labeled, it will be deleted.
  6. Absolutely no NSFL content.
  7. Be nice. Don't take anything personally. Take political debates to the appropriate communities. Take personal disagreements & arguments to private messages.
  8. No advertising, brand promotion, or guerrilla marketing.

RELATED COMMUNITIES:

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] A_Random_Idiot@lemmy.world 10 points 1 day ago (3 children)

Change in tech can be good but not when it’s Microsoft, Apple, Amazon and HP making the changes.

Now, yeah.

I remember when a new microsoft OS was a great thing that brought wonder and excitement instead of bullshit.

3.11 to 95 was revolutionary

Upgrading from 98 to XP was amazing.

XP to 7 was like being blessed by a digital god.

7 was truly the pinnacle of OSes. Everything after 7 started to take the crap and fall apart though. 8 with its stupid tablet design for desktop, 10 for its spyware and bullshit, 11 because you've become the product instead of the OS, and also laying the foundations for a restricted, walled garden like apple has.

I've been on linux for several years now, but god damn do I miss windows 7. It was the peak of operating systems. sleek, stable, usable, and the first OS from microsoft that didnt need regular reformating to maintain stability. It didnt need babying. Things almost never went wrong, and when something did go wrong it was easy to figure out and fix.. I went years between reformats, and those only typically happened because of hardware changes (which often werent necessary, but used as an excuse for digital spring cleaning, basically)

[–] BigBoyShuanzee@aussie.zone 3 points 1 day ago (1 children)

I never had 95, my family couldn't afford a PC back then. But getting out families first PC running Windows ME and spending so many afternoons trying to fix it is that got me into IT support.

Moving to Windows XP was a huge step up and moving to Windows 7 was another step up.

Microsoft has never ever made an OS as good as Windows 7.

7 and XP are equal until in XP you try to drag a full screen window and cannot.

I'm on 10 LTSC IoT and I think (Thanks to people on the Linux sub) I'll be moving to Linux mint Cinnamon.

[–] A_Random_Idiot@lemmy.world 3 points 1 day ago

I agree, windows 7 was the best OS microsoft ever made.. maybe the best OS ever.

It was the peak, and microsoft could do nothing to improve on it..which is why every OS afterwards has relied on slop and creepware.

[–] djdarren@piefed.social 2 points 1 day ago (1 children)

I remember when a new microsoft OS was a great thing that brought wonder and excitement instead of bullshit.

Trouble is, what can the OS makers offer these days?

Apple brought it on themselves by insisting that their platforms had to be updated annually, presumably because it made it easier for them to blacklist older devices more frequently. An unsupported device is basically landfill, right? So you'll have to toss it and buy a new one. Because...reasons.

But really, what are the functional differences and benefits to the end user of moving from Win10 to Win11? Of moving from macOS Sequoia to Tahoe to Golden Gate? I'm not massively au fait with Windows, but from my experience, the only real difference that could be sold as an upgrade is "Moar Copilot!".

We're at a point where hardware from five years ago is every bit as functional as hardware released today. So all of the companies have latched onto AI. But users don't really care about AI. And that leaves Microsoft and Apple and Google with... nothing. This is particularly obvious in the mobile space, where they've run out of hardware features to hang a new device off of. Even the cheapest new smartphone has a still/video camera with surprisingly high quality sensors. They can all connect to high speed wifi and cellular networks. They can all do all of the things people need of them. What else can they add?

But the shareholder value must increase.

It's exhausting.

[–] A_Random_Idiot@lemmy.world 3 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (1 children)

Trouble is, what can the OS makers offer these days?

Corporate OS makers like Apple and Microsoft?

Nothing.

The sad reality is we have hit the point where every OS for the last 15 years have been able to do everything necessary, and would still be able to do everything today if driver and security updates had continued.

Theres always the need to release a new product, from a corporate profiteering perspective, but there is no longer significant progress in the product itself. There is no revolutionary improvement like you saw from,(using windows as an example) say 3.11 to 95. or 98 to XP, or XP to 7.

Beyond that we've just kinda gotten minor iterative improvements(to be fair, we used to get iterative improvements as well bad then, with ME and Vista, as examples), along with a lot of creep and spyware because even the big OS makers realize that the OS as a viable, continuing product is coming to an end, and now they are shifting their attentions towards harvesting your data, tracking you, spying on you, and profiling you, so they can sell/lease/etc that data to others.

The only alternative to this corporate hellscape that exerts ownership over our OS and Computers is to use something like Linux.

and I know some people might cringe at hearing linux, because there are rabid proselytizers for linux, but as of this moment Linux is the only OS that for the most part lets you use modern computing without the creepware thats invaded modern paid-for OS's.

The ease of changing over to linux depends a lot on what you do, and may not be viable for everyone of course.

[–] djdarren@piefed.social 1 points 8 hours ago

Until a couple of years ago I was hard in the Apple ecosystem. I saw things like Universal Control come along and how cool it was that I could control my iPad from my Mac; but only if both were new enough to support it.

Then I began to dabble in Linux, before immersing myself in it. And then I realised that Universal Control was just Deskflow, (or one of the numerous forks of the same project). Which led me to realise just how many of those incredible Apple innovations over the past 10/20 years were mostly just polished versions of things people could do with far cheaper hardware.

Take iPhone mirroring. That's been available to Android users as SCRCPY for god knows how long. But if you use Linux or Windows and an iPhone, it's not for you. For a long time, my iPad got very little use because I can't integrate it with Linux very easily at all. And that's by design. That's how Apple sells more stuff.

[–] kiwifoxtrot@lemmy.world 1 points 1 day ago (1 children)

I think you are misremembering how bad XP was on launch. It took a year or two for it to be stable. Windows Vista was an even worse nightmare before we got to 7.

[–] A_Random_Idiot@lemmy.world 1 points 1 day ago

I didnt have many big headaches with XP. In fact, the only headache I recall having was getting some very old games working, but there were workarounds and eventually they ran fine.

Vista was only a nightmare because vista changed how drivers worked from all previous windows editions, which meant every old legacy device had to have new drivers made and signed for it, which caused major headaches for a lot of people not on the absolute latest and greatest, but that storm did eventually pass.. it should have passed in testing instead in public, which is partly why I didnt mention it, the other part being i never used it on a personal system, but Vista was ultimately a stopgap release due to delays with 7. basically a windows 6.5 if you will.