this post was submitted on 22 Aug 2026
279 points (96.7% liked)

Fuck The USA

830 readers
170 users here now

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Wxfisch@piefed.world 13 points 1 day ago (2 children)

Similar happened around Pittsburgh PA about a year ago. Storms came through and took out tons of power lines leaving people without power for well over a week. The “local” utility was impacted way more than surrounding utility providers due to years of underinvestment in infrastructure maintenance despite regularly raising rates. Turns out that’s what happens when it’s majority owned by overseas sovereign wealth funds (in this case mostly Singapore). When line must go up, maintenance becomes just a cost to be deferred. Good news is there was a ton of blowback and things have gotten better. The state PUC opened an investigation and have prohibited rate increase requests for multiple years at this point. We have had more short flickers but a lot less actual outages so maybe they really have learned a lesson? (Not holding my breath on that one)

[–] saltesc@lemmy.world 8 points 1 day ago

“We strongly disagree with the characterization of Nipsco’s vegetation management practices,” the company said. “Nipsco’s vegetation management spend has more than doubled since 2016, demonstrating our commitment and focus on maintaining a safe and reliable electric system”.

And yet here we are, Nipsco. Maybe they doubled the spend to $8.

I used to live in a remote part of Australia and the longest we went was 8 days because we were cut of fby flooding, apart from helicopter. Repairs were under way fast when the water receeded. But apart from that, there's huge investment in maintenance and repair because of laws enforcing it. Companies will get fined big time if they slip below the government's requirements to operate as a utility provider.

[–] Tollana1234567@lemmy.today 3 points 1 day ago

this sounds like pg&E in cali.