this post was submitted on 21 Aug 2026
210 points (99.5% liked)

Technology

89590 readers
2958 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] gnufuu@lemmy.ca 7 points 2 months ago (1 children)

Many attack vectors happen over your outbound connections. How would a router protect you against those?

[–] NathanRanch@lemmy.zip 3 points 2 months ago (2 children)

Not at router, a firewall, and with rules of course. You're not making any real claims, but I assure you win10 behind a decent firewall setup is probably safer than 11 will ever be.

[–] mpramann@discuss.tchncs.de 3 points 2 months ago (1 children)

That is an insane thing to say. Outbound connections can open you up to all kind of vulnerabilities which will be a lot better documented for Windows 10 than for 11.

[–] NathanRanch@lemmy.zip 0 points 2 months ago (1 children)

Windows 11 is kinda insane tbh

[–] mpramann@discuss.tchncs.de 1 points 2 months ago

Stop dodging dude. Windows 10 might be better from an usability stand point but a firewall won't safe you from all the unpatched exploits it's has + the ones it's going to have

[–] gnufuu@lemmy.ca 2 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago) (1 children)

Your initial comment implied that the default firewall rules of blocking all inbound connections was sufficient. Since you're the one who's making big claims I was hoping you would enlighten us with those firewall rules of yours.

[–] NathanRanch@lemmy.zip 0 points 2 months ago (2 children)

I think you're making some assumptions on my behalf. I said a firewall, not windows firewall.

[–] mpramann@discuss.tchncs.de 1 points 2 months ago

Are you a real person?

[–] gnufuu@lemmy.ca 1 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago) (1 children)

Nobody was talking about Windows Firewall. You are clearly in the "fake it" phase of "fake it till you make it". Otherwise you'd post your magical custom outgoing NAT rules.

[–] NathanRanch@lemmy.zip 1 points 2 months ago (1 children)

This guy is ransomware in a trenchcoat, I'm onto you 🫪

[–] gnufuu@lemmy.ca 1 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago)

I like a joke. That's why I'm so fond of your understanding of firewalls.