this post was submitted on 19 Aug 2026
144 points (100.0% liked)

Climate

8934 readers
275 users here now

Discussion of climate, how it is changing, activism around that, the politics, and the energy systems change we need in order to stabilize things.

As a starting point, the burning of fossil fuels, and to a lesser extent deforestation and release of methane are responsible for the warming in recent decades: Graph of temperature as observed with significant warming, and simulated without added greenhouse gases and other anthropogentic changes, which shows no significant warming

How much each change to the atmosphere has warmed the world: IPCC AR6 Figure 2 - Thee bar charts: first chart: how much each gas has warmed the world.  About 1C of total warming.  Second chart:  about 1.5C of total warming from well-mixed greenhouse gases, offset by 0.4C of cooling from aerosols and negligible influence from changes to solar output, volcanoes, and internal variability.  Third chart: about 1.25C of warming from CO2, 0.5C from methane, and a bunch more in small quantities from other gases.  About 0.5C of cooling with large error bars from SO2.

Recommended actions to cut greenhouse gas emissions in the near future:

Anti-science, inactivism, and unsupported conspiracy theories are not ok here.

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] NotEasyBeingGreen@slrpnk.net 9 points 4 days ago

I really dislike the reaction to research where people say, "of course".

Firstly, unexpected results happen all the time. We don't know until we check!

Secondly, a study like this in particular is important because we didn't know that children's lungs would get better necessarily, or how quickly. It wouldn't have surprised me to find that there was lifelong damage.

Thirdly, research that confirms what we know or expect is very important. Reproduction is at the heart of science! One study means little.