this post was submitted on 16 Aug 2026
14 points (100.0% liked)

NZ Politics

889 readers
5 users here now

Kia ora and welcome to the NZ Politics community!

This is a place for respectful discussions about everything that's political and kiwi

This is an inclusive space where diverse opinions are valued, but please don't be a dick

Other LemmyNZ communities here

 

Banner image by Tom Ackroyd, CC-BY-SA

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
 

I've been taking notes since 2023. Here they are, grouped by depravity level (subjective, yes, I know) and sorted by date within each group. Please share this widely as the election draws near. The last 3 weeks of the campaign are crucial and when this information will make the most difference.

Where possible the minister responsible is noted although really they are all collectively responsible.

It's a lot. As you get into it your eyes will glaze over a bit and you'll start skimming. Try to sit with each item and really feel it.

High Depravity

Medium Depravity

Low Depravity

So there you have it. The last 3 years have been a trainwreck that was especially hard to watch - taking notes during it was my way of coping. I hope it makes a difference.

Once again, please share this with anyone capable of changing their minds. And/or bookmark this, you'll need it later.

There will be SO much that I missed out. Education and health is a true mess at the moment but that's not where my attention goes a lot of the time. Please add what you have in the comments, with a news link if possible.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] absGeekNZ@lemmy.nz 1 points 1 week ago (1 children)

I understand the climate emergency also.

But I am a pragmatist at heart; I know we have a set amount of resources to throw at a problem. I would rather we focus on where the biggest gains would be had.

If I had $16B to throw at the energy system:

  • 1 add 3GW of solar; primarily in Northland and Nelson. ~$6B for panels and infrastructure; 10 year install pipeline.
  • 2 add 1GW of off shore win in Taranaki. ~$2B for turbines and infrastructure; 5 year install pipeline.
  • 3 add another Cook Strait cable. ~$1B for the upgrade.
  • 4 add 5GWh of battery storage in 50 x 100MWh sites around NZ. ~$5B for batteries and infrastructure.
  • 5 bring back the clean car discount ~$1B over 10 years
  • 6 subsidize homes switching from gas to electric heat. ~$0.5B over 10 years
  • 7 keep $0.5B as contingency.

$16B is a big sum; we could do a lot more with it than one project that will have no gains for over a decade.

A well planned solar project can bring on ~150MW in 9 months; then with rolling crews another 150MW every 6 months after that.

[–] rimu@piefed.social 1 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Yes I can see how those would be better value for money.

The amount of resources there are to throw at a problem depends on political will. In 2009 when bankers needed money suddenly there was unlimited resources to throw at that. When Bush wanted to start his multi-decade wars -> unlimited. When Trump wanted to start his forever war -> unlimited. And so on.

[–] absGeekNZ@lemmy.nz 1 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Resources at some point just becomes people to do the work.

[–] rimu@piefed.social 1 points 1 week ago (1 children)

There is no shortage of people. Basically everyone living in a hot country either wants to GTFO now or will in coming decades. We can have as many people as we want (chances are we'll get waaay more than we want).

Politically, that idea is impossible, yes, I know :)

We can bring in the best and brightest from all over the world in a controlled way now and build build build or we can sit on our hands and deal with millions of desperate refugees all at once, later. We both know which it'll be.

[–] absGeekNZ@lemmy.nz 1 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Political vision is an expensive investment. Most parties cannot afford to be too visionary; it means that they have to admit they have been wrong for 40 years.

Lets say that Labour; came out tomorrow and said that neo-lib economics is a bit shit really; what they are saying is that "actually we have been wrong since the early 80's; but believe us now, we are totally trustworthy".

New ideas require new voices; I'm an opportunity supporter, because they are bringing new voices into the mix. They are saying "hey, lets listen to the experts, and actually implement their ideas"

Look at the infrastructure policy; it is not much different than the infrastructure commission recommendations. The work had already been done, they are the ones with the confidence (and naivety) to say, lets just do that!

[–] rimu@piefed.social 2 points 1 week ago

Oh yes, absolutely. I worked at parliament for 5 years so I understand the political dynamics. Basically if you stick your head out too high it gets blown off. That's arguably a feature, not a bug.

I know I'm just dreaming.

TOP is the most interesting part of this election, for sure.