this post was submitted on 12 Aug 2026
9 points (90.9% liked)
Wisconsin
1032 readers
1 users here now
A community for the state of Wisconsin.
All news, pictures, discussions, and interesting links are welcome here.
Other communities:
Banner: Wikimedia User:Royalbroil CC BY-SA 2.5
founded 4 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
Maybe because Milwaukee hates cops...
2017:
https://www.aclu.org/press-releases/state-legislator-joins-aclu-lawsuit-against-stop-and-frisk-program-milwaukee-police
Like, I didn't know who this guy was yesterday, but considering that happened in Milwaukee, and after that he became a vice chair of the Milwaukee ACLU...
I feel like people from Milwaukee were familiar with him.
I've seen a lot of people claim he's a moderate/neoliberal, but I haven't seen anyone explain what parts of his policy fit that.
Be very cautious of people claiming we shouldn't vote D. They should at least be able to give some sort of explanation, not just labels used as insults.
Just had to follow up: You were right. Thank god! (Milwaukee County showed up.)
We're legitimately on the way to some FDR shit...
The next battle tho is going to be House/Senate leadership.
Without a corrupt DNC, there's no reason to settle for Jefferies/Schumer. We need progressive leadership, because that's what Dem voters want.
The problem with a non-biased DNC tho, is they won't put their finger on the scale at all. People need to mobilize and call their Dem representatives/senators and telling them we need effective leadership, and the guys who had it the last two years weren't effective.
It shouldn't take much of a fight, but we can't half ass it. We can't half ass anything
I'm writing my representatives this morning.
He's also the Milwaukee county executive, so of course they know him. But I hadn't heard of him either, and that's really the issue. I don't care about people claiming that we shouldn't vote D, they're about as relevant as a fart in a hurricane, since they change the minds of exactly nobody. If anything, they might do some good by increasing people's awareness of politics. (It's an empirical fact that repeatedly raising an issue just hardens hardens people's attitudes and entrenches, rather than changing, their opinions.)
A lot more people are disconnected from politics, or marginally aware, at best. The question that I have is whether enough Milwaukeeans will come out for the general election to offset the lack of marginal voters from the rest of the state, whose attention is going to fade due to the lack of energy, enthusiasm, and sheer novelty of a candidate like Hong, combined with unfamiliarity with Crowley. And since Milwaukee has a track record of lower turnout, I worry.
I mean, Wisconsin had the second highest turnout of any state in the last election...
I don't think turnout will be an issue, and without trump personally on the ballot, Republican turnout is definitely going to drop.
His endorsee is on the ballot, though. And the wildcard is that this will be the first election under the new Legislative districts, but still, more Republican-held seats are up for election than Democratic seats, and they've put up a couple of new constitutional amendments that throw red meat to the base to juice turnout. I hope to god you're right, but I can't shake the bad feeling about it.
All state parties have been operating at "campaign levels" since February 2025...
Normally that wouldmt even have started yet, they'd just now be ramping up and it would last maybe two months every two years...
Dems are going to out perform everywhere, that's why there's such a big push to get the DNC chair to resign before midterms, after it there's not going to be any denying that this works better than neoliberalism.
If this is "campaign levels," that's depressing as hell.