this post was submitted on 11 Aug 2026
128 points (97.8% liked)

interestingasfuck

9576 readers
67 users here now

For exceptionally interesting content

Rules:

  1. Posts must be interesting
  2. Posts must be based in reality
  3. No hateful content
  4. No harmful content
  5. Beauty is in the eye of the beholder

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Full title: A 44-year-old man went to the hospital after pus began oozing from his chest, where doctors discovered a knife that had been embedded in his body for eight years. According to the report, he showed no signs of chest pain, breathing problems, coughing, or fever, and was otherwise in good health.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] IAmNorRealTakeYourMeds@lemmy.world 19 points 6 days ago (4 children)

why don't they have metal detectors on the doors leading to the MRI?

[–] cravl@slrpnk.net 4 points 5 days ago (1 children)

My guess? They're not sensitive enough for small bits, but could still lead to staff complacency.

i think small bits like tattoos are just painful, but there should be one for the bigger items that always ends up in the news, like the guy who brought in a gun

[–] CaliforniaSober@lemmy.ca 3 points 5 days ago* (last edited 5 days ago)

Possibly because a standard magnetometer cannot detect reactive elements down to the level that would be affected by a giant insane field associated with an MRI?

A simple xray, or a pass-through of a single metal detector at a court house is one thing….

…but Imagine a tattoo with ferrous ink. In a simple airport magnetometer, it’s no thing. In an MRI it’s ripped out of flesh.

Basically tattooing itself can be a very wild scenario. I caught artists in Tunisia making do and had a friend shooting cats in Cuba as we provided ink.

[–] FalschgeldFurkan@lemmy.world 3 points 5 days ago

Because medical drama shows need the unexpected surprise moment

[–] Grannymcgrannypants@lemmy.nz 3 points 5 days ago

That's an excellent question. I guess they never thought of it?