this post was submitted on 07 Aug 2026
579 points (97.4% liked)
memes
22244 readers
2962 users here now
Community rules
1. Be civil
No trolling, bigotry or other insulting / annoying behaviour
2. No politics
This is non-politics community. For political memes please go to !politicalmemes@lemmy.world
3. No recent reposts
Check for reposts when posting a meme, you can only repost after 1 month
4. No bots
No bots without the express approval of the mods or the admins
5. No Spam/Ads/AI Slop
No advertisements or spam. This is an instance rule and the only way to live. We also consider AI slop to be spam in this community and is subject to removal.
A collection of some classic Lemmy memes for your enjoyment
Sister communities
- !tenforward@lemmy.world : Star Trek memes, chat and shitposts
- !lemmyshitpost@lemmy.world : Lemmy Shitposts, anything and everything goes.
- !linuxmemes@lemmy.world : Linux themed memes
- !comicstrips@lemmy.world : for those who love comic stories.
founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
I have unconfirmed theories.
For better or worse, usb devices need to be polled by the computer all the time, instead of delivering interrupts at the moment of input events. I'm baffled by this fact, but am not versed in hardware design well enough to weigh pros and cons. I assume that the polling is handled by the usb controller, though.
To my vague knowledge, the various GUIs all request content from the owner of the selection at the moment of pasting, i.e. ctrl-v — presumably both to avoid storing large swathes of pictures and such, and to allow conversion to the target format on the fly. However, iirc some environments require defining the available formats when content is copied, so idk how this meshes with that. I'm not a desktop programmer, so not entirely sure. Perhaps it's just to simplify copying for the programmer of the source app, instead of exposing the whole innards.
Properly, any input event would be delivered to the app (or rather the UI element) that was active at the time of the event — and presumably the OS UI runs at a higher priority for that. However, in practice it seems to be a toss-up as to whether it really works like this.
Thanks, that's interesting - I hadn't thought about the window messages responding to update the all clipboard
It's odd to me that the paste is almost never the previous clipboard value - it's basically always null