this post was submitted on 06 Aug 2026
41 points (97.7% liked)
Privacy
10649 readers
23 users here now
A community for Lemmy users interested in privacy
Rules:
- Be civil
- No spam posting
- Keep posts on-topic
- No trolling
founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
IDK; "anti-pervert" suggests some sort of active measure against pervert glasses. And I wonder if that wouldn't be possible.
You could add UV lights to it to blind the camera. But you are right these don't have that. This is just a (I think very funny) marketing stunt.
I wonder if it would be possible to jam the Bluetooth signals, or somehow poison the packets, with which they connect to the wearer's smartphone, too. With the obvious side effect of jamming all devices using Bluetooth in the immediate vicinity. Other than that, what else in the streets uses 2.402 GHz to 2.48 GHz? 🤔
WLAN depending in the standard in use runs exactly there.