this post was submitted on 05 Aug 2026
71 points (94.9% liked)

World News

57395 readers
1372 users here now

A community for discussing events around the World

Rules:

Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.


Lemmy World Partners

News !news@lemmy.world

Politics !politics@lemmy.world

World Politics !globalpolitics@lemmy.world


Recommendations

For Firefox users, there is media bias / propaganda / fact check plugin.

https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/media-bias-fact-check/

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Deebster@infosec.pub 2 points 11 hours ago (1 children)

AISI admitted it was not actively monitoring the agents’ behaviour during the evaluation and said it was putting tighter controls on internet access in tests as a result of the incident, introducing constant monitoring and reassessing its design of tests.

Sounds like the AISI are irresponsible and negligent - they took off the guardrails and gave it internet access, then didn't monitor it.

[–] SnoopSqueak@lemmy.today 2 points 10 hours ago (1 children)

It's possible all these "totally unexpected breaches" are just AI companies testing the waters to see what they can get away with.

"Oopsie poopsies, we didn't know our AI would scrape tax records when we told it to do that! Totally unexpected emergent behavior, we are not responsible..."

[–] Deebster@infosec.pub -1 points 10 hours ago (1 children)

AISI is the AI Security Institute, so it's within their remit to discover what the AI companies' products can do - but then to not be monitoring them while they were running is where I call incompetence and negligence.

This is at least independent verification that these "breaches" aren't just AI bro marketing.

[–] SnoopSqueak@lemmy.today 1 points 10 hours ago (1 children)

Wrong, they're in bed with Anthropic.

As part of the AI Security Institute rebrand, Technology Secretary Kyle also announced a new partnership with AI firm Anthropic.

https://www.infosecurity-magazine.com/news/uk-ai-safety-institute-rebrands/

[–] Deebster@infosec.pub 0 points 9 hours ago (1 children)

Here we were having a civil, good faith discussion, then you start flinging around downvotes to try to suppress any post you don't 100% approve of. That's not conducive to quality discourse, and you should stop it. You comments votes are downvotes 42% of the time.

Thanks for the link and I'll look into this, but I won't be talking with you any further.

[–] SnoopSqueak@lemmy.today 1 points 8 hours ago

I thought it was a bad comment, so I downvoted it. I may be open to removing the downvote.

You comments votes are downvotes 42% of the time.

I don't understand what you're trying to say here. My comments get downvotes 42% of the time? Or I downvote comments 42% of the time?

I often have discussions with death cultists and open bigots, I may be in the habit of downvoting and/or being downvoted.