this post was submitted on 05 Aug 2026
368 points (96.7% liked)

memes

22324 readers
1911 users here now

Community rules

1. Be civilNo trolling, bigotry or other insulting / annoying behaviour

2. No politicsThis is non-politics community. For political memes please go to !politicalmemes@lemmy.world

3. No recent repostsCheck for reposts when posting a meme, you can only repost after 1 month

4. No botsNo bots without the express approval of the mods or the admins

5. No Spam/Ads/AI SlopNo advertisements or spam. This is an instance rule and the only way to live. We also consider AI slop to be spam in this community and is subject to removal.

A collection of some classic Lemmy memes for your enjoyment

Sister communities

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] LurkingLuddite@piefed.social 8 points 1 week ago (2 children)

Well, be careful what you ask for, because some dumb execs will take "show it" as, "make this character the biggest gay cliche that ever existed", which ... is harmful representation I'd say.

[–] ILikeBoobies@lemmy.ca 1 points 1 week ago (2 children)

I'd prefer that over it being meaningless.

This is a world where everyone is extremely accepting, no one cares this character is gay and they act the exact same as every other character but... let's remind the audience they're gay at every turn and it's somehow a disadvantage that never comes up.

It's like when a girl character is written like a boy. Why make the distinction if it's not something the person being represented can relate to?

[–] LurkingLuddite@piefed.social 1 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago)

Why make the distinction? Exactly! They made no distinction, except for adding the token...

While my example was warning against cliche extremes, you point at the exact other end of tokenization that exists in droves in modern media. Vapid, stupid, uncreative, and pointless "representation" that does nothing but assuage the ignorant and inflame the opposition.

[–] DeLancre@piefed.social 2 points 1 week ago (2 children)

I'd prefer that over it being meaningless.

Folks, I think we found that mysterious target audience behind "Star Trek: Discovery"

[–] ILikeBoobies@lemmy.ca 2 points 1 week ago

Drag Race actually.

i think it was my conservative relatives who love star trek for some reason. they loved hatewatching discotrek.

i'm just mad they wasted the best name on that series

i mean i've met a few dozen of that dude just doing music. my experience is they tend to stop being as flagrant about their cliches, they just get more quiet. which fuck that, be who you are. if you're a walking cliche (like me) sometimes it's nice to see other walking cliches.