this post was submitted on 05 Aug 2026
649 points (98.4% liked)

memes

22369 readers
2576 users here now

Community rules

1. Be civilNo trolling, bigotry or other insulting / annoying behaviour

2. No politicsThis is non-politics community. For political memes please go to !politicalmemes@lemmy.world

3. No recent repostsCheck for reposts when posting a meme, you can only repost after 1 month

4. No botsNo bots without the express approval of the mods or the admins

5. No Spam/Ads/AI SlopNo advertisements or spam. This is an instance rule and the only way to live. We also consider AI slop to be spam in this community and is subject to removal.

A collection of some classic Lemmy memes for your enjoyment

Sister communities

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] fonix232@fedia.io 33 points 1 week ago (4 children)

No, that's the evolution of venture capitalism.

Step 1: groundbreaking service comes in that fills a market hole

Step 2: people flock to service

Step 3: service gets VC funding to continue operations, subsidising the users

Step 4: service gets "copied", competitors crop up, use VC funding to eke out their own marketshare while making things worse for everyone but themselves

Step 5: expansion plateaus as interest in service generalises (basically, everyone who could be interested, is already using it)

Step 6: VC funding depletes, company has to start making a profit - leading to price hikes, which is followed by other players in the market as that's how capitalism works

Step 7: price hikes not being enough, service tries to capitalise on their userbase (think restricting features to a higher paid tier, introducing new tiers that strip away features, introducing ads, etc.)

Step 8: market is saturated with plateaud services, user movement is minimal, and everybody hates it because it's expensive, and reintroduced the same problem the initial innovative service meant to fix.

[–] MonkderVierte@lemmy.zip 12 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

Which is why i call it vulture capitalism: born to feed the vultures.

[–] couldhavebeenyou@lemmy.zip 2 points 1 week ago (1 children)

It replaced linear tv with video on demand

[–] fonix232@fedia.io 1 points 1 week ago (1 children)

VOD was a thing before streaming tho

[–] ayyy@sh.itjust.works 1 points 1 week ago (2 children)

And it was terrible, expensive, and did t work half the time.

[–] fonix232@fedia.io 1 points 1 week ago

Nah, it worked pretty well. Streaming was just more convenient, and came too soon after VOD became widely available.

[–] ILikeBoobies@lemmy.ca 1 points 1 week ago

Blank tapes were more convenient IMO.

[–] heartSagan5@lemmy.zip 1 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (1 children)

Sure, but Netflix was not venture capital as far as I know. It started with mailing subscriptions then grew into greatness and now, it’s shittier than ever.

[–] fonix232@fedia.io 1 points 1 week ago

You know wrong.

Even in the early days (97-01), they've used venture funding (approx $80mil) for the DVD mailing business.

And the reason they didn't really go the VC funding way later is because they had an IPO in 2002, which meant instead of relying on VC funds, they took on massive amounts of debt to allow the takeoff of streaming.

[–] SLVRDRGN@lemmy.world 1 points 1 week ago

No different than what all these AI services are trying to inject into culture right this moment.