this post was submitted on 05 Aug 2026
280 points (100.0% liked)

Technology

86957 readers
3415 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] roofuskit@lemmy.world 89 points 3 days ago (3 children)

This is hilarious because a year or so ago these idiots were saying that building a bunch of data centers would stabilize the Texas grid and were encouraging building them.

But what do you expect from a southern state so corrupt it can't supply enough power to heat homes in the winter and builds fertilizer factories across the street from schools.

[–] JohnEdwa@sopuli.xyz 2 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (1 children)

Done right, it actually would.
Powering those centres would require building ton of new power generation, and in the case of a risk of running out of power, non critical infrastructure - like a datacenter - can be disconnected from the grid to redirect that power to the uses that actually matter. Like here in Finland, if we are risking blackouts for homes during winter for example, they will cut power to factories and stuff like that first in an effort to prevent it. It's part of the contracts for commercial electricity connections, and they have to just accept that.

The bigger the section of non-critical infra you have, the more capacity you can free up in an emergency.

In Texas, though? Not very optimistic it would ever work that way.

[–] roofuskit@lemmy.world 1 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

No, they would not build enough because that would reduce profit. And households would pay more because demand is up, and households would get disconnected. We've already seen how they do things.

Case in point, they've reversed their outlook already.

[–] Fredselfish@lemmy.world 11 points 3 days ago (1 children)

That's ok our fucking stupid Oklahoma government will tell them to come here were apparently we have plenty of water and electricity.

Fucking morons going kill us all.

[–] EvacuateSoul@lemmy.world 7 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago) (1 children)

In the West, Texas explosion, the schools came more than 20 years after the plant, to be fair.

https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC5047761/

[–] roofuskit@lemmy.world 10 points 3 days ago

The order of operations does not matter in the slightest. The government allowed it to happen, and Texas had no laws to prevent it.

The rest of the world has zoning laws to prevent that kind of idiocy.