this post was submitted on 01 Aug 2026
5 points (100.0% liked)
Aotearoa / New Zealand
2205 readers
36 users here now
Kia ora and welcome to !newzealand, a place to share and discuss anything about Aotearoa in general
- For politics , please use !politics@lemmy.nz
- Shitposts, circlejerks, memes, and non-NZ topics belong in !offtopic@lemmy.nz
- If you need help using Lemmy.nz, go to !support@lemmy.nz
- NZ regional and special interest communities
Rules:
FAQ ~ NZ Community List ~ Join Matrix chatroom ~ Alternate frontends ~ Donate
Banner image by Bernard Spragg
Got an idea for next month's banner?
founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
I don't think we can or should ignore that our larger cities, the land can be damn near half the cost of the house. If we want to make new houses cheaper, that's a good place to look.
But also this article highlights that instead of self-inspection, we could have made it a lot faster by having them pass inspection the first time. If they can do it right the first time this means fewer inspections and should also cut down on the wait for an inspector to come and check.
I also wonder if were gonna start seeing houses advertised for sale as "passing council inspection" vs these "trusted" companies who have not been inspected, and since a large proportion fail their first inspection surely a house that has not been inspected is worth less due to the higher risk of not being built properly?
You make interesting points about self-inspection. I don’t trust it. The leaky homes situation from the ‘90s shows that people will cut corners when they think they can.