this post was submitted on 01 Aug 2026
659 points (98.2% liked)

Comics

1667 readers
1115 users here now

Post your comics here. Single or multi boxed comics.

Please mark nsfw when appropriate.

Same rules as primary server, no hate.

Please warn others if there may be triggers.

Please mark if the comic is yours either in the title or description

obvious ai images will be removed, please include a source to prevent this

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
TotallynotJessica@lemmy.blahaj.zone
erotador@lemmy.blahaj.zone
659
JK Rowling is Anti-Rights (quokk.au)
submitted 19 hours ago by Quokka@quokk.au to c/comics@lemmy.blahaj.zone
79 comments fedilink hide all child comments
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Arghblarg@lemmy.ca 92 points 17 hours ago* (last edited 17 hours ago) (3 children)

Wow, the PDF was scrubbed thoroughly from the net. archive.is doesn't have it (just a screenshot of the first page), archive.org has removed it ...

Has anyone managed to find the original PDF elsewhere?

the document was named

"Report_-_A_growing_threat__the_anti-rights_movement_in_the_UK_July_2026.pdf"

EDIT: Found a copy elsewhere. https://wingsoverscotland.com/Report_-_A_growing_threat__the_anti-rights_movement_in_the_UK_July_2026.pdf

I haven't read it yet and thus have no opinions on it. But I object to Orwellian memory-holing, so f*ck censorship.

[–] RVGamer06@sh.itjust.works 11 points 9 hours ago* (last edited 9 hours ago)

Thanks for the PDF, looks like it's my RPi seedbox's time to shine!

EDIT: Here's the magnet link for anyone interested :3, it's not like UK lawsuits have any effect here(unless Italy has a secret treaty with the MI6 or some shit). Anyone can help me seed?

[–] Arghblarg@lemmy.ca 44 points 16 hours ago

More info:

On the page https://tacc.org.uk/2026/07/13/amnesty-international-uks-anti-rights-report-has-been-withdrawn-for-review-why-it-still-matters/

Around the same time, Sex Matters, one of the organisations identified in the report, announced publicly that it had challenged Amnesty’s publication and suggested that, had the report remained online, it would have brought defamation proceedings. Amnesty has not said whether its review is connected to that correspondence.