https://xcancel.com/SwipeWright/status/2081789091046182975
My scholarly article "Why There Are Exactly Two Sexes" has been accessed over 50K times, placing it in the top 8 of all articles in the journal's history.
Activists refuse to cite it or acknowledge it exists.
I'm still waiting for someone to publish a scholarly scientific takedown of it. You'd think this would be a top priority for those asserting "sex is a spectrum" who believe my work is bigoted, pseudoscientific, and actively harming a vulnerable community.
Until then, you can read it and arm yourself with a thorough understanding of the 5 major frameworks that activists and activist scientists use to undermine the binary nature of the sexes and why they all fail.
https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s10508-025-03348-3
One reply to his paper, Response to Wright’s (2025) “Why There Are Exactly Two Sexes”, is probably why he had to qualify takedown with "scholarly" and "scientific". Nicely put, it's neither. He published a response to that, Response to Mahr’s (2026) Response to Wright’s (2025) “Why There Are Exactly Two Sexes”
Nah. There's a nice big fat block button for this discussion.
We can just let people be themselves.
Hiding divisive bias in science language isn't new, and it isn't bringing value.
I'm not entirely sure what you are saying. Maybe you could rephrase it so I could understand?