https://xcancel.com/SwipeWright/status/2081789091046182975
My scholarly article "Why There Are Exactly Two Sexes" has been accessed over 50K times, placing it in the top 8 of all articles in the journal's history.
Activists refuse to cite it or acknowledge it exists.
I'm still waiting for someone to publish a scholarly scientific takedown of it. You'd think this would be a top priority for those asserting "sex is a spectrum" who believe my work is bigoted, pseudoscientific, and actively harming a vulnerable community.
Until then, you can read it and arm yourself with a thorough understanding of the 5 major frameworks that activists and activist scientists use to undermine the binary nature of the sexes and why they all fail.
https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s10508-025-03348-3
One reply to his paper, Response to Wright’s (2025) “Why There Are Exactly Two Sexes”, is probably why he had to qualify takedown with "scholarly" and "scientific". Nicely put, it's neither. He published a response to that, Response to Mahr’s (2026) Response to Wright’s (2025) “Why There Are Exactly Two Sexes”
My scholarly article that no one will read. Lul. No one is going to peer review your trash because even looking at it gives it some measure of legitimacy in your eyes. You get nothing. Good day sir.
Published as a commentary. Not as a real scientific article. So I agree with you, somebody didn't want to face their peers.
Yes that was the thought I was trying to put forth there. Thanks for refining it.