this post was submitted on 28 Jul 2026
343 points (100.0% liked)

politics

31060 readers
1613 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles. Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to US politics and contain quality and original content. Social Media adjacent hosts like Substack are allowed, but ONLY if they tie back to a company/subsidiary. No personal or friend group blogs and no self-promotion. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and re-hosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing other users of being bots or paid actors.
  3. No memes, trolling, misinformation, or low-effort posts/comments (including reposts). If you see posts like this that anger you, do not engage. Report, block, and live a happier life than they do. Any slap-fight is subject to comment removals. Fights full of rule violations will result in temporary bans to cool off.
  4. No manipulating votes via bots or alt accounts; this will result in permanent bans. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in an account ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be permanently banned.

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules and use critical thinking when reading, posting, and commenting. Users that repeatedly have comments or posts removed, weaponize reports, or violate the code of conduct, will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users. The reason(s) behind moderator action(s) are publicly available through the Modlog.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Wasn’t quite sure what community to post this..

A recent EnhancV survey of 1,000 full-time U.S. workers subject to new or stricter return-to-office policies found that 72 percent suspect these mandates are really a voluntary attrition strategy — a strategy by their own employers to make them quit their jobs.

The damage is strategic, not merely emotional. Baylor University’s reporting on office mandates and brain drain found that firms with mandates faced greater turnover among women, senior employees, managers and high-skilled workers, while job vacancy duration increased and hiring rates declined. In other words, the people with the most options are often the first to leave. The employees who remain may not be the most committed — they may simply be the least mobile.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] lennybird@lemmy.world 115 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (2 children)

The data is clear. Workers are happier, and more productive at home. Huge benefits to society and environment as well.

The only exception seems to come from those who live alone and where work is their only physical social contact.

My work lost decades of experienced workers forcing people back to office with long commutes.

[–] TryingToBeGood@reddthat.com 95 points 1 month ago (3 children)

The idea of people hauling ass all the way in to the office only to sit on zoom calls—sometimes with people in the same office—simply blows my mind.

[–] ThePantser@sh.itjust.works 59 points 1 month ago (2 children)

A close person to me is sueing their employer for ADA violations because they became disabled during the pandemic while working full time WFH but now the office is RTO and they won't give them an exception to continue to WFH which is a clear ADA violation because they could do their job 100% without the accommodation when they worked for over 5 years remote.

Having oversight is not an essiental function of a job if you have ever in the past been able to accomplish the work 100% remotely.

[–] chahn.chris@piefed.social 22 points 1 month ago

Boy I hope they win this shit out of this.

[–] isleepinahammock@lemmy.blahaj.zone 10 points 1 month ago (2 children)

We need to pass a law requiring employers to pay twice the payroll tax contribution for any office worker that they require to work in the office.

[–] explodicle@sh.itjust.works 3 points 1 month ago

And then they'll cut everyone else's salary in half.

Pay is a tricky flexible thing that varies per person and has a million exceptions. Laws on salary generally don't work; politicians have taken us for a ride.

The only thing that will protect our pay regardless of inflation and legalese BS is to change the supply and demand equilibrium with a union.

[–] TarantulaFudge@startrek.website 1 points 1 month ago

I had a friend come stay with us all the way from Germany and I was astonished how much better employment laws are there. He said he wanted to switch jobs and he went on an internet portal and clicked a button and they offer complete assistance with changing jobs including paying for school to change to entirely different trade, job placement assistance etc. I couldn't believe it

[–] goferking0@lemmy.sdf.org 8 points 1 month ago (1 children)

I've been told it's a better experience to book conference rooms instead of us just being able to be remote on zoom or teams for things that require screensharing. Cause it's not like half the meeting is getting that room working 🙄.

But yeah in office is so much better

[–] phutatorius@lemmy.zip 3 points 1 month ago

There have been a few times when it was useful being able to see the whites of their eyes, but generally, there's no benefit besides knowing how tall people are, and (not always a benefit) being aware of how they smell.

For difficult line-management conversations, though, face-to-face is better, although there was one guy who got spun up to the point where a physical altercation was possible-- luckily, I talked him down. He was having mental-health issues, his work was suffering, but didn't want a paid leave of absence so he could get his shit sorted. He was afraid we'd sack him while he was on leave (which we don't do). That problem solved itself after he had an episode outside working hours and got sectioned. He resigned while he was being treated. Luckily it wasn't the US, where police too often shoot people when they're having a crisis.

[–] halcyoncmdr@piefed.social 3 points 1 month ago

Gotta justify the $20k/month office lease somehow.

[–] phutatorius@lemmy.zip 4 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

What makes you think that employers actually care if you're happy? Or that they care about society or the environment?

The only exception seems to come from those who live alone and where work is their only physical social contact.

I have colleagues with small kids at home. They like coming into the office because the nippers distract them too much.

My employer tried imposing post-Covid RTO mandates on us, compliance was slow and reluctant, but they soon realized that they were better off selling off and/or subletting the massive office space we had. Now, a new RTO mandate would be impossible to implement because there aren't enough desks or floor space. And that's just fine. Our capex is much lower, opex has gone down a bit too. It's absurd anyway. My team is mainly made up of contractors, my customers are also non-local, they're based in different cities, so my meetings with them have to be online whether I WFH or I'm in the office. I'd rather be at home, the coffee is better and I can take conjugal breaks without distressing my coworkers.