this post was submitted on 26 Jul 2026
483 points (95.0% liked)

memes

22083 readers
2453 users here now

Community rules

1. Be civilNo trolling, bigotry or other insulting / annoying behaviour

2. No politicsThis is non-politics community. For political memes please go to !politicalmemes@lemmy.world

3. No recent repostsCheck for reposts when posting a meme, you can only repost after 1 month

4. No botsNo bots without the express approval of the mods or the admins

5. No Spam/Ads/AI SlopNo advertisements or spam. This is an instance rule and the only way to live. We also consider AI slop to be spam in this community and is subject to removal.

A collection of some classic Lemmy memes for your enjoyment

Sister communities

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Drekaridill@lemmy.wtf 31 points 23 hours ago (1 children)
[–] Jestzer@lemmy.world 17 points 22 hours ago (2 children)

Other parts of the internet would agree with you

[–] Abyssian@lemmy.world 31 points 22 hours ago* (last edited 21 hours ago) (3 children)

Please don't waste your time with AI 'AI detectors'. Unless there's a synthid or something similar, they're entirely bullshit.

The last thing anyone should ever be using AI for is telling them what is and isn't real/true.

[–] KSPAtlas@sopuli.xyz 1 points 5 hours ago (1 children)

That image is obviously AI though, the bumper on that tesseract is way too small compared to the grass blades

[–] Abyssian@lemmy.world 1 points 4 hours ago

Possibly. Could be other image editing. Since the picture didn't seem to exist on the internet until a few days ago I imagine it's AI, the entire point is that unfortunately there's no way to be sure unless you know something's provenance.

[–] PalmTreeIsBestTree@lemmy.world 2 points 9 hours ago

That’s obviously a Missouri plate too and looks credible as someone with one…

[–] Jestzer@lemmy.world 4 points 21 hours ago (1 children)

I will admit I didn’t think that maybe the site itself was using AI, and even sources I’ve found saying so aren’t entirely reliable (although I wouldn’t be surprised), so dare I say this wasn’t me denying “common sense.”

[–] Abyssian@lemmy.world 6 points 21 hours ago (1 children)

Ah, my bad for being a dick about it. Seeing people asking AI if shit is true/real has gotten so bad I instantly start slamming my head into the desk without pausing to make sure they knew that's what they were doing first.

[–] Jestzer@lemmy.world 4 points 21 hours ago (1 children)

No worries, I appreciate it. The whole situation around AI is just unfortunate, including the arguments about things being AI-generated (or how to tell they are without throwing it back at AI.)

[–] Abyssian@lemmy.world 2 points 21 hours ago* (last edited 21 hours ago)

If something doesn't have a synthid or similar thing built in to generated images by a very few AI companies then there is no way to tell if image, video, or text was created by AI unless it has an obvious tell, which is getting more and more rare.

[–] Drekaridill@lemmy.wtf 3 points 22 hours ago

Good to know my ai sense is still somewhat accurate