this post was submitted on 25 Jul 2026
562 points (95.0% liked)
People Twitter
10229 readers
1319 users here now
People tweeting stuff. We allow tweets from anyone.
RULES:
- Mark NSFW content.
- No doxxing people.
- Must be a pic of the tweet or similar. No direct links to the tweet.
- No bullying or international politcs
- Be excellent to each other.
- Provide an archived link to the tweet (or similar) being shown if it's a major figure or a politician. Archive.is the best way.
founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
I think it's more accurate to say it's a measure of risk , but it leads to the same result. Good, consistent repayment history means you are a known low risk. Without that consistent and recent history you are an unknown risk. Giving credit to low risk borrowers is where the profit is.
You're missing their point.
If you pay off a loan, your credit score will likely decrease. Why would someone who's able to pay off a loan be considered a higher risk than someone who pays $x a month to slowly pay down the same amount?
It's absolutely about potential profit over risk. In the latter situation, the bank makes way more money.
It's not just risk (negative income fot them), it is also the potential gain.
A guy that gets stuck in debt via overdraft all the time, but manages to scrounge just enough extra income to pay it off, is a gold-mine for them.
They are a higher risk because they no longer have an active demonstration of reoccurring on time payments.