this post was submitted on 22 Jul 2026
844 points (95.8% liked)

Firefox

7509 readers
11 users here now

A community for discussion about Mozilla Firefox.

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] cardboardcruncher6400@lemmy.world -2 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Yeah he and all those who agree with him are Hitler 2.0 for sure, that word totally has meaning nowadays when you guys all throw it around over nothing right

Be sure to let me know when he’s killed 17 million people which will surely include yourself from disagreeing with him (aka what a real Nazi would do to you), I’m sure it’ll happen in reality and not only in the fantasy in your mind!

[–] T00l_shed@lemmy.world 1 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Ok nazi simp. Keep simping for nazis

[–] cardboardcruncher6400@lemmy.world 0 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (1 children)

-Can't refute me as is incapable of admitting his definition of a Nazi is objectively incorrect

Lmfao such an interesting pattern evolving from people on this website, you all try and pounce on me with a weak surface-level argument that 'sounds good' yet tuck your tails and run as soon as my response gets too difficult for you to handle, very credible and trustworthy attitudes right here, keep living in lala land pretending he is a nazi as it's the only fake way you'll be 'correct' :)

[–] T00l_shed@lemmy.world 1 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Lmfao keeps simping for nazis, thinking digging his nazi simping hole will make him less a nazi simp. Lmfao, such a classic patern of the nazi simp, being defensive when called out on their nazi simping. Keep living in nazi apologize land.

[–] cardboardcruncher6400@lemmy.world 0 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Nice meltdown reply bro, guess I hit a nerve with that one eh

Define what a Nazi is to me

[–] T00l_shed@lemmy.world 1 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (1 children)

Lol, of course a nazi simp would think that is a meltdown reply, classic nazi simp.

Since you simp for nazis the ability to understand reality is clearly deficient for you, so here, a super quick and easy web search, since that is too complicated for you

[–] cardboardcruncher6400@lemmy.world 0 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (1 children)
  1. Doesn't apply at all (surely even you can understand this one)
  2. Doesn't apply at all (although probably falsely applies to you guys since you all live in lala fantasy land together in this bubble and wrongly pretend it's reality by exaggerating nothingness out the ass and holding hands together over it; feel free to give me your specific examples for me to demolish if you disagree)
  3. Doesn't apply at all (literally anyone with any belief is allowed on X, no matter how opposite to his own opinions and beliefs)

Now explain how I'm incorrect with evidence and examples, welcome to debating like an adult 101

[–] T00l_shed@lemmy.world 1 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Imagine simping so much that you refuse to believe the definition applies to a nazi. Evidence and examples are meaningless to you nazi simps because you dont live in reality lol. Lmfao even.

[–] cardboardcruncher6400@lemmy.world 0 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (1 children)

-Is incapable of providing any evidence and examples to explain how I'm incorrect

That's 2 fails in a row with my even holding your hand this time - you're really good at this!

It's not a hard task bud, unless you genuinely can't provide any ofc, because then it's literally impossible for you and you must try your best to dance around the issue 24/7 without ever addressing it since anything else would be admitting you're wrong :)

If you were debating me in front of an audience you would be getting laughed out the room right now fyi, this is debating 101, if you cannot address or counter a point you lose by default

I'll give you 1 last chance my friend, try your best to respond like an adult and not a child, once again your extremely challenging task is to provide ANY evidence and examples to explain how I'm incorrect - surely if I'm some big dummy this should be the easiest task in the world for you right???

[–] T00l_shed@lemmy.world 1 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (1 children)

Lmfao, I give you the definition, which applies, and you say it doesn't because "reasons". You are right that people would be laughing, but they be laughing because youre a nazi simp.

I dont "debate" with nazis and nazi simps. Not worth my time.

[–] cardboardcruncher6400@lemmy.world 0 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

Lmfao, I give you the definition, which applies, and you say it doesn’t because “reasons”.

Yet you can't refute my reasons! "which applies" nah it doesn't and I proved with points why it doesn't - meanwhile you can't prove it does against my points! How strange! (Almost like... you can't! Because they don't apply!)

You are right that people would be laughing, but they be laughing because youre a nazi simp.

More like laughing at you failing to argue and debate like anything but a child, whilst somehow genuinely thinking you're 'winning' this argument, delusion of a fundamental concept on a whole new level even above your fantasy Nazi claims

I dont “debate” with nazis and nazi simps. Not worth my time.

Well you've pretended I'm one of those for how many comments now and yet it seems you've replied back to me every single time doesn't it?

Yikes looks like I've made yet another point that you can't refute eh

Should I say "I don't debate with serial killers" and start pretending you are a serial killer without being able to prove it with all the evidence stacked against me then walk away anyway and say "haha I won!" actually believing myself? DeeLuuSion