this post was submitted on 23 Jul 2026
456 points (99.4% liked)

Blahaj Lemmy Meta

2917 readers
434 users here now

Blåhaj Lemmy is a Lemmy instance attached to blahaj.zone. This is a group for questions or discussions relevant to either instance.

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
 

In light of the dev silently blacklisting blahaj.zone, many of its users and several other instances, we have removed tesseract from the available lemmy front ends we offer.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Limonene@lemmy.world 20 points 14 hours ago (1 children)

What's the deal with this Tesseract developer? Did they just block everyone that has ever looked at them funny? I looked at the blocklist and saw all kinds of people: trans-oriented, piracy-oriented, and lots of tankie-oriented instances. And a lot of users I'd never heard of.

Now they've taken their whole site offline, presumably so they won't have to answer any questions.

[–] SnotFlickerman@lemmy.blahaj.zone 15 points 14 hours ago* (last edited 13 hours ago) (1 children)

Now they’ve taken their whole site offline, presumably so they won’t have to answer any questions.

Tea is just all over the damn floor at this point.

...but like... what did they think was gonna happen? Did they think they were so clever that no one could figure it out? Even when it effectively broke functionality on sites that used it but were blocked? Like they couldn't add in code to disable specific parts of it if it was deployed on one of those sites so they could keep the whole thing secret? Like just another little regex search string to ignore any users and sites that match the site domain as its rolling out, so they would keep using it and be none the wiser because it would work for them but continue to have its blocklist maintained and secret because it wouldn't cause any problems.

I hate that it takes me like zero effort to conceptualize a better way to have done this shady shit, but on the other hand I guess I'm just glad they weren't that clever.

EDIT: Upon reflection, I do wonder if this was at least partially vibe coded, because LLMs don't have forethought and can't plan ahead for contingencies like that. Because it also seems like a no-brainer that it would lead to configuration failures if deployed on one of the sites that is blocked.

[–] SatyrSack@quokk.au 9 points 13 hours ago* (last edited 13 hours ago) (1 children)

EDIT: Upon reflection, I do wonder if this was at least partially vibe coded, because LLMs don't have forethought and can't plan ahead for contingencies like that. Because it also seems like a no-brainer that it would lead to configuration failures if deployed on one of the sites that is blocked.

The dev was quite vocal about being against LLM usage. Most notably, I remember their April Fool's Day post about an update that adds a bunch of AI features. The post was obviously just a big joke, full of disparaging comments about LLMs. With that said, that was April (maybe even 2025, I can't remember). It's possible that their opinion had changed in the time since. But I doubt it, personally.

EDIT: It was 2025.

Canonical link: https://dubvee.org/post/3069664

Mirror: https://lemmy.world/post/27634335

[–] SnotFlickerman@lemmy.blahaj.zone 4 points 11 hours ago* (last edited 11 hours ago)

I won't lie, that mention of Nicole kinda got me nostalgic. What happened to you Nicole? Why did you forsake us?