this post was submitted on 23 Jul 2026
77 points (90.5% liked)

Technology

86633 readers
3863 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] palordrolap@fedia.io 10 points 3 days ago (2 children)

Sooo, hyperbole aside, I did a quick search on the site of the retailer I last obtained parts through, right before the prices exploded, and their cheapest 1x64GB RAM DDR5 stick is about £2320.

(Big assumption here that the motherboard only has four RAM slots. If you're going to cram 192GB onto it, you're going to need at least a couple of those, and preferably three, not 2x64+2x32, hence not looking at smaller capacity sticks.)

As I write, eBay has one seller with a single 1x64GB DDR5 at a quarter of that, which makes me think they must be going by pre-explosion pricing, but it also has something at well over £10k, four times the other way (and more), so at least logarithmically, the stand-alone retailer is right in the middle.

That means that this server is probably going to be well in excess of £10k when they finally ship it with full spec. If they're offering a warranty or support contract, probably around £20k. (Or £30k if they do the trick of simply changing the currency sign on a US dollar amount).

[–] plz1@sh.itjust.works 4 points 2 days ago

It's not RAM slots, it's unified memory, built into the CPU/chip. ALso means you can't expand it later.

[–] Pyotr@lemmy.world 15 points 3 days ago (1 children)

Not that it matters much since I think your math here checks out - but the framework desktop is all soldered memory, so no slots for memory needed. Likely some higher density chips used here than a 64GB DIMM stick. Point being, your estimate may still be optimistic!

Still don't know why the company who prides itself on reparability and upgradibility even released a unit with unrepairable components, even given their latency justification.

[–] apfelwoiSchoppen@lemmy.world 11 points 3 days ago (1 children)

The soldering decisions are confounding because of their mission.

[–] Bob_Robertson_IX@discuss.tchncs.de 8 points 3 days ago (1 children)

It was a tradeoff between replaceable RAM or high throughput. For this device they felt the performance was more important than the ability to replace / upgrade RAM.

[–] sorghum@sh.itjust.works 9 points 3 days ago (1 children)

It was more AMD than Framework AFAIK. Soldered memory is basically a requirement to run the strix halo platform.

[–] wewbull@feddit.uk 1 points 3 days ago

They've used LPCAMM on the Framework 13 Pro. I did wonder if they were going to update the Desktop to do the same.