this post was submitted on 22 Jul 2026
45 points (100.0% liked)
Space
2563 readers
29 users here now
A community to discuss space & astronomy through a STEM lens
Rules
- Be respectful and inclusive. This means no harassment, hate speech, or trolling.
- Engage in constructive discussions by discussing in good faith.
- Foster a continuous learning environment.
Also keep in mind, mander.xyz's rules on politics
Please keep politics to a minimum. When science is the focus, intersection with politics may be tolerated as long as the discussion is constructive and science remains the focus. As a general rule, political content posted directly to the instanceโs local communities is discouraged and may be removed. You can of course engage in political discussions in non-local communities.
Related Communities
๐ญ Science
- !curiosityrover@lemmy.world
- !earthscience@mander.xyz
- !esa@feddit.nl
- !nasa@lemmy.world
- !perseverancerover@lemmy.world
- !physics@mander.xyz
- !space@beehaw.org
๐ Engineering
๐ Art and Photography
Other Cool Links
founded 4 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
This is a lot of hype to say that a planet, an object which orbits a star, is a planet. Anyone who has been seriously looking at stars and thinking about what makes up the universe has come to the conclusion that the thing that orbits a star (and has all the other criteria of a planet) is a planet, even if the star it's orbiting also orbits another star.
Likewise, the idea that a moon can have a moon has been discussed. The problem is that the rules for what constitutes a moon make it hard for that to happen so, given the size of the Milky Way, there's probably a number of examples out there.
We could call objects orbiting moons, moonies!
We could name an award after it!
Oh, wait...