this post was submitted on 21 Jul 2026
453 points (99.1% liked)

Technology

86563 readers
2970 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] cavitationfetishist2@quokk.au 1 points 2 days ago (1 children)
[–] Omgpwnies@lemmy.world 11 points 2 days ago (1 children)

More that they are destroying the books in the process of digitizing them, they basically cut the pages out of the book and feed them into a scanner with a document feeder attached.

[–] T156@lemmy.world 17 points 2 days ago (2 children)

It's worth pointing out that this is standard practice when digitising books in most places, if they're not irreplaceable. Mass-produced books would fall under that category.

Turning the page and photographing what's there is really only done for some books, which you can't afford to destroy.

[–] Omgpwnies@lemmy.world 5 points 2 days ago

From what I've read previously, they're destroying all the books, regardless if they're historic and one-of-a-kind or a mass produced paperback.

[–] cavitationfetishist2@quokk.au 2 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Do you think they're discriminating? Really?

[–] T156@lemmy.world 6 points 2 days ago (1 children)

At least in this case, yes. They'd just not get them, since they'd want something they can already easily process, and the source for the quote is a bookseller, who isn't likely to sell something like that to begin with.

An old book that might disintegrate and damage the scanner and hold things up would be undesirable, compared to either a new one, or a reprint of an old one.

[–] cavitationfetishist2@quokk.au -1 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago)

That's not how most of that works.

Things would be sold in bulk. Mistakes happen. Literally the only part of what you said that makes any sense is that fucked up pages could clog the pipe.