this post was submitted on 17 Jul 2026
1027 points (98.2% liked)

memes

22023 readers
3304 users here now

Community rules

1. Be civilNo trolling, bigotry or other insulting / annoying behaviour

2. No politicsThis is non-politics community. For political memes please go to !politicalmemes@lemmy.world

3. No recent repostsCheck for reposts when posting a meme, you can only repost after 1 month

4. No botsNo bots without the express approval of the mods or the admins

5. No Spam/Ads/AI SlopNo advertisements or spam. This is an instance rule and the only way to live. We also consider AI slop to be spam in this community and is subject to removal.

A collection of some classic Lemmy memes for your enjoyment

Sister communities

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Septimaeus@infosec.pub 2 points 4 days ago (1 children)

I didn’t address the point because a lot of my family’s old photos look like this. Twins become more common later. But also i expect the actual age gaps represented in this photo might not be so close. The children on the right are likely not children at all.

Also genetics has to play some part here. Women in my family have relatively few complications in childbirth, and recover more quickly than usual along with their libido apparently, so just a few months between birth and pregnancy is common.

I’m just trying to offer a plausible alternative explanation that I can vouch for so you don’t have to imagine this nightmare.

[–] velma@sh.itjust.works 4 points 4 days ago* (last edited 4 days ago) (1 children)

My father was the fourteenth child out of sixteen siblings. I’m very familiar with this type of family setup.

Regardless of women who want big families, 16 children is abuse. Both of the mother’s body and of the children as human beings.

I’ve given birth before as well. It is dangerous to have pregnancies back to back.

Women didn’t have nearly as much choice back then.

[–] Septimaeus@infosec.pub 2 points 4 days ago (1 children)

I fully agree with you re: most of your points, and don’t necessarily disagree otherwise, just trying to not expect the worst of people I don’t know based on a photo <3

[–] velma@sh.itjust.works 2 points 4 days ago (1 children)

That’s fair and sorry to be blunt. Your intent was to see the good and I do appreciate that.

[–] Septimaeus@infosec.pub 3 points 4 days ago

And likewise, I appreciate your vigilance looking out for others who may be oppressed, where bluntness is so often overdue.