this post was submitted on 15 Jul 2026
397 points (94.8% liked)

pics

29403 readers
479 users here now

Rules:

1.. Please mark original photos with [OC] in the title if you're the photographer

2..Pictures containing a politician from any country or planet are prohibited, this is a community voted on rule.

3.. Image must be a photograph, no AI or digital art.

4.. No NSFW/Cosplay/Spam/Trolling images.

5.. Be civil. No racism or bigotry.

Photo of the Week Rule(s):

1.. On Fridays, the most upvoted original, marked [OC], photo posted between Friday and Thursday will be the next week's banner and featured photo.

2.. The weekly photos will be saved for an end of the year run off.

Weeks 2023

Instance-wide rules always apply. https://mastodon.world/about

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] deft@lemmy.wtf 48 points 3 weeks ago (25 children)

Not sure how I feel about this.

From my understanding the island wishes to stay part of the UK, but I don't know if historically that's because they colonized the fuck out of it.

Argentina is also kind of an asshole country, so is the UK. Both in their own way.

Argentina also played like absolute assholes. The UK is notorious for being assholes about football.

I guess I'll just say oof.

[–] calcopiritus@lemmy.world 52 points 3 weeks ago (20 children)

There was no colonization.

The issue with the malvinas/Falklands is that there are no "historically rightful owners", since no one lived there when they were discovered by the British.

But it's also not as easy as "the British discovered, so it's theirs", because they just discovered and left. They didn't leave no settlement.

The islands have a complicated history, both sides have strong arguments in favor of themselves, there's no clear cut "rightful owner".

[–] deft@lemmy.wtf 3 points 3 weeks ago (7 children)

Hm that's tough. I always like to think boundaries set by countries are bullshit anyway, but it is located closer to Argentina. Another comment says they both want it because the island comes with vast amount of fishing so economic reasons. And the UK probably put money forth to develop some sort of living situation on there.

[–] stark@sopuli.xyz 5 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

The US is closer to Greenland than Denmark is.

[–] deft@lemmy.wtf 3 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

But with that thought Canada is closer.

[–] SpaceCowboy@lemmy.ca 1 points 3 weeks ago

Greenland could become part of Canada some day. Though proximity is just a minor part of it.

load more comments (5 replies)
load more comments (17 replies)
load more comments (21 replies)