this post was submitted on 15 Jul 2026
160 points (95.5% liked)

Technology

86401 readers
2645 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[โ€“] Armand1@lemmy.world 12 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (1 children)

This seems to be his view:

In the kernel community we do open source because it results in better technology, not because of religious reasons.

He doesn't seem to subscribe to the idea that everything you use MUST be open source, as some more radical open source advocates do, but instead that more software SHOULD be open source.

I would definitely prefer if AI was open source and self-hosted (or at least E2EE if cloud hosted). Sometimes though the best tool for the job as things stand is closed source.

Aa for the legally dubious output, while AI can exactly replicate training data, it rarely does nowadays. It's usually an amalgam of stuff.

[โ€“] evadersnack@sopuli.xyz 4 points 1 day ago

I highly doubt E2EE cloud LLMs are even theoretically possible. Let alone the computational overheads for said theoretical zero knowledge computing.