this post was submitted on 15 Jul 2026
680 points (97.5% liked)

Technology

86401 readers
2848 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Vlyn@lemmy.zip 42 points 1 day ago (1 children)

DeepSeek has really led the way here, especially as they are a bit more hardware constrained. Plus they openly publish their findings and release open source models, so high hopes there.

It's probably China's play to pop the AI bubble, but I'm all for it (:

[–] ScoffingLizard@lemmy.dbzer0.com 0 points 14 hours ago (3 children)

I wonder what all is in the deepseek code that is malicious. I'd like to try it but don't want a million Mb/s of tracker shit across my network and can't run it myself.

[–] teslekova@sh.itjust.works 2 points 1 hour ago

The beauty of it is that it doesn't need tracker shit. It works to destroy the US AI bubble even without anything malicious within.

And considering how hard the US researchers have been trying to control the output of their general LLMs, with little success, why would the Chinese have found a way before everyone else even thinks it's possible?

[–] Vlyn@lemmy.zip 3 points 13 hours ago

They are open source models, nothing malicious about them. I'd be much more careful about where you run your agents on. The wrong prompt can even make a non-malicious model misbehave.

[–] qaz@lemmy.world 3 points 13 hours ago* (last edited 13 hours ago)

AFAIK, their open models are distributed as weights, not executables and are therefore not able to start network connections / run code. There if of course tool-calling functionality but that just works by having the model output a special pattern and having something external run predetermined commands based on that.