this post was submitted on 13 Jul 2026
8 points (90.0% liked)
Chess
152 readers
20 users here now
The existing chess community on lemmy.ml/c/chess seems to be dead, moderators are not reachable and is hosted on .ml which is defederated by many instances.
Use this community for anything related to chess: news, memes, puzzles, guides, etc.
Current Tournaments
Naroditsky Memorial Rapid & Blitz July 3-4
Recent past tournaments
Bullet Chess Championship - June 22-27
Play online
-
Lichess => Free, libre, open source, ad-free, unlimited puzzles, european-based, newly developed mobile app, constant improvement
-
Chess.com => Many features for paying members only, larger player base
Current FIDE Rankings
| Player | Rating |
|---|---|
| Carlsen, Magnus | 2823.2 |
| Caruana, Fabiano | 2792.0 |
| Nakamura, Hikaru | 2792.0 |
| Sindarov, Javokhir | 2777.0 |
| Keymer, Vincent | 2767.4 |
Community Tournaments?
Maybe in the future, once there is a community
founded 2 months ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
Since the black king (e1) is in check by the white bishop (h4), I think the previous moves could have been:
spoiler
Though that series of moves seems silly, given it's a blunder for black to needlessly sacrifice their rook, and for white to not immediately just take the rook instead of moving the king out of danger (planning to take the rook on the next turn).
Does a reverse puzzle like this actually have an objective solution? Seems like there could be many possible moves that lead to this position
However, since f3 is also covered by black's bishop, it is impossible for white's king to have been on that square before that ;) The very specific set of constraints make it so that this puzzle should really just have a single objective solution. (Solution is in the spoiler tag in the post body)