this post was submitted on 12 Jul 2026
328 points (93.9% liked)

politics

31129 readers
2234 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles. Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to US politics and contain quality and original content. Social Media adjacent hosts like Substack are allowed, but ONLY if they tie back to a company/subsidiary. No personal or friend group blogs and no self-promotion. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and re-hosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing other users of being bots or paid actors.
  3. No memes, trolling, misinformation, or low-effort posts/comments (including reposts). If you see posts like this that anger you, do not engage. Report, block, and live a happier life than they do. Any slap-fight is subject to comment removals. Fights full of rule violations will result in temporary bans to cool off.
  4. No manipulating votes via bots or alt accounts; this will result in permanent bans. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in an account ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be permanently banned.

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules and use critical thinking when reading, posting, and commenting. Users that repeatedly have comments or posts removed, weaponize reports, or violate the code of conduct, will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users. The reason(s) behind moderator action(s) are publicly available through the Modlog.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
 

US senator Mitch McConnell on Sunday revealed for the first time that a fall led to his hospitalization, breaking the silence about the Kentucky Republican’s condition after weeks of mounting speculation about his health.

The statement included a smiling picture of McConnell with his wife, Elaine Chao, a tacit response to speculation online that he had died or was incapacitated. McConnell held a copy of Sunday’s Washington Post sports section in his hand.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] ChunkMcHorkle@lemmy.world 20 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago) (2 children)

Upvoted. I'm not sure I agree with you yet because of the perfect plaid in his shirt and the lack of obvious fault in the pixelization throughout, but I absolutely respect the receipts you brought.

Also, his wife is smiling. I'm not absolutely sure it's because he's alive, but okay.

[–] Rhaedas@fedia.io 26 points 2 months ago

There's a lot of very small details that AI would have messed up. Like the background stuff in the picture seems to match okay. But AI is getting better, or they could have had a good photoshop expert. The lettering is due to the camera resolution, I don't see anything off in word placement or length anywhere.

If it's fake, then they'll flub up soon enough somewhere else in continuing it.

[–] zikzak025@lemmy.world 23 points 2 months ago (2 children)

If he was dead, what they would do is get someone else in a photo like this and edit the head with AI to that of Mitch McConnell. The rest of the photo can be genuine and exhibit no signs of AI editing, and AI could probably simulate just his face realistically enough to be believable.

On that note, one of the most unbelievable things is that he's smiling, which he truly does not do.

So I would guess 1 of 2 things: either that is not Mitch McConnell we are seeing, or that is him and he is suffering some pretty severe brain damage.

As much as I want to jump on the "he's dead" bandwagon, I am more inclined to believe the latter just because it seems more believable and that's the impression I get from this photo. Just the expression on his face and how meekly he is holding the newspaper there lead me to think that he's really not all there anymore. But the Republicans wouldn't want that bit of information to come to light either, as he would still be considered "incapacitated" and unfit for office, so they probably still want to keep anyone from speaking with him. The longer they can keep up the charade, they can just have someone else essentially vote for him like the Dems did for Dianne Feinstein before she died.

[–] ChunkMcHorkle@lemmy.world 5 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago)

Good comment. To support your theory of injury to the brain, look carefully at the photo. (If you're on desktop you can click on it to get a better view.) In my own layman's opinion, his pupils do not seem to be well aligned, and there may be some ptosis that the direction of his gaze is minimizing.

They could be aligned and I'm just looking at it wrong, but a direct facing look would have gone a lot further to prove sentience, IMO.

[–] OwOarchist@pawb.social 5 points 2 months ago (1 children)

Could also just prop his corpse up into position, with limbs held up by wires. A talented makeup artist/mortician could easily make his face look alive for one still photo.

[–] zikzak025@lemmy.world 2 points 2 months ago

Possibly, but that sounds like way more effort than simply using digital tools to achieve the same outcome.