Privacy

10249 readers

666 users here now

A community for Lemmy users interested in privacy

Rules:

Be civil
No spam posting
Keep posts on-topic
No trolling

founded 3 years ago

MODERATORS

iopq@lemmy.world

411

Reframing smart glasses as 'pervert glasses' (this.weekinsecurity.com)

submitted 15 hours ago* (last edited 15 hours ago) by XLE@piefed.social to c/privacy@lemmy.world

60 comments fedilink hide all child comments

Smart glasses equipped with cameras, microphones, and AI are a creeping privacy and security nightmare, prompting backlash.

And rightfully so.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] antlion@lemmy.dbzer0.com 0 points 7 hours ago (1 children)

There is no privacy in public, by definition of those two words. I’m less concerned about a camera on somebodies face, and more concerned about the legality of doing facial recognition, and identifying and tracking of people without their explicit consent. See one is about the personal utility of camera-interfaced computing, and the other is corporate espionage. But unless lawmakers can draw that line and enforce it, we will probably just end up with spyware.

[–] mojofrododojo@lemmy.world 1 points 4 hours ago* (last edited 4 hours ago)

There is no privacy in public, by definition of those two words.

creep. so quick to carve out the rules by which you and other can invade the privacy of individuals. you know there's a difference between general photography and this. you know this. I don't have to explain it to you.

you're just a creep who wants to creep on women and kids.