this post was submitted on 07 Jul 2026
607 points (99.0% liked)

World News

57284 readers
2105 users here now

A community for discussing events around the World

Rules:

Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.


Lemmy World Partners

News !news@lemmy.world

Politics !politics@lemmy.world

World Politics !globalpolitics@lemmy.world


Recommendations

For Firefox users, there is media bias / propaganda / fact check plugin.

https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/media-bias-fact-check/

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Ukraine struck Russia's largest oil refinery, located in the city of Omsk, on Monday, marking what its forces say was its furthest-ever drone attack in the war.

The Omsk facility, which processes about 21 million tons of oil a year, is in Western Siberia and about 1,700 miles from Ukrainian territory — roughly the distance between Los Angeles and Houston.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] merdaverse@lemmy.zip 45 points 3 weeks ago (23 children)

We need some research into how effective drone strikes against refineries are to stop climate change. Are they a net gain in carbon emissions, considering the cost of manufacture and the prevented emissions?

[–] goferking0@lemmy.sdf.org 18 points 3 weeks ago (7 children)

Gotta make it worse.

There's the emissions from while it's on fire plus some of the chemicals in it are worse after being burned like that then in regular emissions. Or become other environmental issues on their own once released/burned.

Then the emissions from building a new one.

It's so much better to just shut it down because no one needs it than blow them up

[–] RaoulDook@lemmy.world 3 points 3 weeks ago (3 children)

Also on the comparison of "on fire" vs used as fuel - IDK about the emissions during the refining process, but when gas or diesel is burnt as fuel in a car, there are typically several emissions control systems reducing the pollution produced

[–] nlgranger@lemmy.world 3 points 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago) (1 children)

I doubt the majority of engines consuming oil are euro-5 compliant: cargo ships, airplanes, military vehicles, electricity generators, water heaters, tractors, none of these typically use catalytic converters.

[–] RaoulDook@lemmy.world 2 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

Good point, I was just thinking about cars. Cars are what typically takes the blame for pollution, but it's really more the big industries doing it at scale

[–] phutatorius@lemmy.zip 1 points 2 weeks ago

And the military.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (4 replies)
load more comments (19 replies)