this post was submitted on 02 Jul 2026
411 points (98.8% liked)

People Twitter

10146 readers
510 users here now

People tweeting stuff. We allow tweets from anyone.

RULES:

  1. Mark NSFW content.
  2. No doxxing people.
  3. Must be a pic of the tweet or similar. No direct links to the tweet.
  4. No bullying or international politcs
  5. Be excellent to each other.
  6. Provide an archived link to the tweet (or similar) being shown if it's a major figure or a politician. Archive.is the best way.

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
SendMeYourTaTas@sh.itjust.works
pelespirit@sh.itjust.works
411
Statisticians, is this true? (infosec.pub)
submitted 1 day ago by cm0002@infosec.pub to c/whitepeopletwitter@sh.itjust.works
60 comments fedilink hide all child comments
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] SkaveRat@discuss.tchncs.de 1 points 2 hours ago (2 children)

Genuine question: what's confusing about this post?

There are some that are confusingly structured, but this one should be quite obvious

[–] prole@lemmy.blahaj.zone 1 points 29 minutes ago (1 children)

Obvious would be top to bottom. You know, like how every human reads.

[–] SkaveRat@discuss.tchncs.de 1 points 19 minutes ago (1 children)

For replies, yes. And that is the case. But the first one is a quote, not a reply

[–] prole@lemmy.blahaj.zone 1 points 15 minutes ago

And it makes sense to put the reply before the thing they're replying to.

[–] Rekorse@sh.itjust.works 1 points 1 hour ago

You have to read the posts and then put them in order yourself. I see these a lot and I'm still only ever like 90% sure I'm ordering them right.

The other commenter is right, its a stupid way to list a chain of events considering its out of order and doesn't even start with "1".