this post was submitted on 30 Jun 2026
368 points (99.2% liked)

Technology

86364 readers
3095 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Prove_your_argument@piefed.social 107 points 2 weeks ago (2 children)

if I was on this guy's jury I would flat out refuse to convict him on any charge for this.

Shouldn't be legal to setup systems outdoors for mass surveillance. Cameras outside to inhibit vandalism is one thing, but this is warantless wiretapping equivalent.

[–] SpacePanda@mander.xyz 37 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

I agree, you could show me a video of his mom watching him on camera saying its him doing this and I would say theres no proof, its ai lol

[–] pinball_wizard@lemmy.zip 6 points 2 weeks ago

Yes. His Mom looked shifty. Not enough evidence to convict.

[–] prole@lemmy.blahaj.zone 3 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

Careful where you say this, otherwise they'll make sure you're never in a position to even consider doing that.

[–] willington@lemmy.dbzer0.com 5 points 2 weeks ago

Definitely you'd never say this during a jury selection process.