this post was submitted on 25 Jun 2026
796 points (99.3% liked)

Technology

86512 readers
3093 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Undaunted@feddit.org 1 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

But this is not what that discussion is about. The person above said that the employees should pay their AI usage with part of their salaries. We're not talking about freelancing or similar.

When I'm employed for 100k a year, 40h per week, I can't just only work 20h per week, but claiming to have worked 40h. My employer would not be very happy about that, because my pay is not directly bound to the amount of deliverables I create but how many hours I actually work.

And with AI they just hope, that I get the work of 60h done in only 40h. If I just work less without disclosing it and someone finds out, I could say goodbye to my job and probably also get sued.

[–] boonhet@sopuli.xyz 1 points 3 weeks ago

If THEY want you to use AI then of course they better be paying for it.

If YOU want to use AI then IMO it's completely fair to pay for it yourself and just work less assuming your output stays the same.

The article makes it sound like people are opting to use AI for simple tasks, burning tokens just because they can. I'm gonna have to agree with the person above that it'd be stupid for a company to pay for that and especially stupid to encourage it.

Now, for the 40h thing: Not such a huge thing in the software engineering world, at least in some parts of the world. The average person has 2-3 hours of being truly productive in an average day. It's why you have things like ping pong tables and playstations in offices and in some companies I've worked at, it wasn't really a problem to leave before 5 PM after getting in at 10 AM and having an hour long lunch. So the hours worked to hours paid balance is already a bit fluid. Of course it comes with the expectation that when shit hits the fan, you work overtime.