this post was submitted on 25 Jun 2026
717 points (99.4% liked)

People Twitter

10115 readers
2041 users here now

People tweeting stuff. We allow tweets from anyone.

RULES:

  1. Mark NSFW content.
  2. No doxxing people.
  3. Must be a pic of the tweet or similar. No direct links to the tweet.
  4. No bullying or international politcs
  5. Be excellent to each other.
  6. Provide an archived link to the tweet (or similar) being shown if it's a major figure or a politician. Archive.is the best way.

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Semi_Hemi_Demigod@lemmy.world 17 points 1 day ago (2 children)

Smiths were generally wealthier so they had a better diet and what amounted to medical care, and they were rarely put in combat because they were needed to make weapons. So more of them survived.

[–] schipelblorp@sh.itjust.works 13 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (1 children)

[smiths] were rarely put in combat because they were needed to make weapons. So more of them survived.

That's how it works for my dwarves, too.

[–] teyrnon@sh.itjust.works 5 points 1 day ago (1 children)

People in cthe middle ages in ciities were wealthier and healthier, and free. People in the country were slaves or tools of the local lords. City air makes you free they would say, cities were filled with free people, and run by guilds generally, smiths chief amongst them. Other cities were more merchant ruled chiefly. The nobility forever looked down on commerce, everything except agriculture and war generally.

You couldn't just move into a city, you needed an in, like getting accepted as an apprentice in a guild.

Totally true, and there were also smiths scattered around rural areas in small towns like mechanics today.