this post was submitted on 25 Jun 2026
798 points (97.8% liked)

Technology

85745 readers
3995 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Dnb@lemmy.dbzer0.com 4 points 1 day ago (1 children)

What are you talking about? Why would companies be more fuel efficient if not forced to? That's why the regulations existed in the first place because companies weren't doing the right thing unless forced to by law

[–] krisevol@lemmus.org 0 points 1 day ago (1 children)

And the law made the cars bigger

[–] Dnb@lemmy.dbzer0.com 2 points 20 hours ago* (last edited 20 hours ago) (1 children)

The law didn't. Companies circumventing it did. Need more regulation not less

[–] krisevol@lemmus.org 0 points 19 hours ago

The company's didn't circumvent anything, they followed the regulation. The regulation was the problem. Car were getting better emissions and mileage, and emission standards were getting better. The law as written made selling small cars less profitable than selling large ones. So companies naturally went to selling large vehicles.

More regulation could have helped in this situation sure, but they didn't do that. In the end they caused a generational problem instead of admitting they were wrong and changing the rules